ITT post pieces of art
Felix Gonzales-Torres
albert bierstadt
>>656431992
damn forgot the picture
>>656431965
That's not art, that's a pile of candy
https://youtu.be/9WU0c01ETgc
>>656431965
Everybody can stack gummy bears
>>656432089
>>656432050
Educate yourselves
>>656431809
>>656432158
Reeducate yourself from your shitty education
>>656432158
Go bullshit somewhere else with your arts degree. What is art is subjective. Therefor go fuck yourself
>>656431965
I judge art by how much effort looks to have gone into it, this goes in the not much pile.
>>656432306
>>656432316
It's work about his partner who died of aids. It's the weight of his partner in candy. People take some as they enter or leave the space. Representing the weight loss and withering away from the disease as well as the idea of it spreading.
Get out of your mom's basement
some unknown autist did this one.
i like it
>>656432567
see
>>656432630
Effort doesn't make art worthwhile
>>656432630
So not much effort, piled some candy then farted out an arty explanation.
>>656432738
*doesn't always
>>656432799
then what "effort art" is worth talking about?
you can't judge art by how much effort has gone into it. Someone asked Picasso "what is art?" and he just point to a bulls head he had made by sticking the handle bars of a bicycle to the seat
>>656432630
>work about his partner who died of aids.
>makes art of diabeetus
That's not just lazy it's retarded.
>>656432985
"Art are lies that tell the truth" -Picasso
>>656433182
thats fucking hot
>>656433046
It was made in 1991. Well before diabetes was as rampant as it is in your family now
>>656432898
If a piece looks to have taken effort to create. e.g. painting a square blue then putting a paragraph underneath explaining why it's art is pure bullshit.
"Art"
>>656433295
so you have no answer. good to know
>>656432089
Everybody can learn to paint.
>>656433364
Basically anything in this thread apart from the pile of garbage.
JoJo is the best art in Za Warudo :^)
>>656433372
>>656433328
up nignips
>>656433259
There's barely any diabeetus in my family.
Because we aren't American.
>>656433406
powerful
>>656432988
best piece so far
>>656433372
Would be so much better with the nazionalsocialistischer nonsense.
>>656433466
>>656433485
>goya
>>656433485
You just got Kandinsky'd.
ITT: Dumb people who don't comprehend art and "judge it by its effort" (sic).
>>656433606
>my sides
Why is someone defending a pile of candy?
>>656433491
I'll take that as you don't have a valid argument to hold up what you were spewing out of your ass instead of constructively thinking
>>656433406
dat dere candydoll mansion
loli maids
Art.
>>656433653
>ITT : Pretentious fags who think they have better opinions.
>>656433702
thats pretty fucking awesome
>>656431809
Ban.png - Anon
>>656433750
Oh yeah this is the maker's mark on the back of it.
>>656433694
Well I'm sorry you can't diferentiate between actual criticism and faux criticism just for the sake of provoking a reaction.
Then again what do I expect from someone who defends a pile of candy.
>>656433653
oy vey, the smugness...
go sniff farts out of wine glasses hipster scum
>>656433685
Why are you posing antique "art" that's not topical to our way of life and hasn't had any meaningful input in 1000 years
>>656433762
You got something wrong about me there mate,
> pretentious faggot who knows they have a better opinion
>>656433984
nope
>>656434023
kek
>>656433921
And even more so, why is he posting antique art in 267x400?
>>656433913
>>656434004
I thought this was Maynard James Keenan
>>656433912
Cute. Then point out the actual and faux criticism for me? I haven't seen any criticism from you other than "it sucks because it doesn't take effort"
>>656434023
Is that triceratops shit?
If so 10/10 will purchase.
https://youtu.be/9WU0c01ETgc
>>656433921
Because I'm of the opinion of "L'art pour l'art".
>>656434164
kek
Sorry to disappoint.
>>656433249
Gesaffelstein - Pursuit
https://youtu.be/oRSijEW_cDM
>>656434248
>L'art pour l'art
This anon gets it.
>>656434185
>"it sucks because it doesn't take effort"
>Things I haven't said: the post.
Do you happen to be Felix Gonzales-Torres?
Because it would explain a lot.
>>656433898
kek
i got one too, except in ceramic
>>656434248
Isn't art for arts sake nothing better that making decorative art? You don't want any lasting meaning or for it to have an impact on you outside: that's pretty
One of my favorites
>>656434416
I need more cocaine for this video
>>656434475
Felix Gonzales-Torres is deaded.
>>656434475
He died 20 years ago
>>656434572
Better
>>656434572
Why's that (sheer curiosity)?
probably the greatest colorist of all time
>>656434707
MS paint hero
>>656434765
This casting choice...
>>656434707
Oh, Andrew.
>>656434704
>>656434735
>>656434765
>>656434792
oh I got you mah nigger. I got some choice art to post.
>>656434707
Elaine Sturtevant?
i thought 'art' was anything that caused a reaction after experiencing it and contiues to cause a reaction when re-experienced, no matter in what form.
>>656434550
>Isn't art for arts sake nothing better that making decorative art?
And what's wrong with that?
Wat's wrong with liking something for the beauty and effort instead of the message/meaning behind it?
>You don't want any lasting meaning or for it to have an impact on you
The meaning of an art piece is secondary to me.
Then again why you're arguing taste is beyond me.
>>656434698
I love the way that he uses shades of purple and pink along the horizon and in the lake to express the shimmering iced over lake.
I love the faded linearism along the backdrop
I love the faded yet mystical atmosphere altogether
>>656434642
>>656434648
Of aids?
bump with more art
>>656433310
Mt aquarium.
>>656434880
>>656435016
"My"
>>656434985
Also a fave
>>656435016
Why the skull?
>>656434985
I hear you. Keen eye.
>>656432630
So, the general public are the disease?
Nice.
Enjoy the AIDS.
This artwork is a tumblr post and a statement, not artistic.
>>656435126
My fave ever.
Sisyphus.
>>656435011
this is one of the most depressing images i've seen
>>656434948
Just questioning your read of art. Nothing is wrong with it if that's your taste. Just think about why you like art. At the end of the day just saying you like it because it's beautiful and hard to do, isn't an intellectual conversation
>>656435011
Saw it at MOMA. It's located in a strange, yet comfy corner.
>>656435011
>>656434998
yep yep. The 80's were tough
This some tribal I did the other night, about seven hours
>>656433364
i honestly think that explanation isnt entirely bullshit. art is kinda like comedy in that if the piece requires a longwinded explanation before you can appreciate it, they shouldve just made a better piece in the first place
>>656432630
>>656432630
So, while that gives the piece more meaning, it doesn't mean it's a good piece. A piece of art should be able to stand without the artist's intention; the intention allows for a more enriched viewpoint after already interpretting and digesting it.
>>656434684
Holy shit, I just cried for a second out of nostalgia. The painting itself isn't a masterpiece or anything, but it reminded me of my family's backyard in Sweden during the winter this one time. A teenage lover of mine lives there. We were very close when we were teens, but nowadays never speak anymore.
Can you tell me more about the painting and the artist?
>>656435364
>At the end of the day just saying you like it because it's beautiful and hard to do, isn't an intellectual conversation
not person you are talking to, but maybe art is meant to be enjoyed and not talked about?
friend of mine says art is a dialog, and to understand the language, you need to be educated in art.
I think its interesting that some art is worth thousands ( basically meaning "i like it" ) and other art is worth hundreds of thousands ( lots of people find it a significant dialog )
>>656433182
More details about this pls.
>>656435133
It was giving to me by the store I bought the tank setup from.
>>656435168
The candy is the "disease" that people "get" when they take some because of the pleasure the candy gives them. ei the pleasure of sex as that allures you to the disease
>>656435545
Why is the explanation not part of the artwork? It's like saying movies can only exist in silence.
>>656435585
That's one form of art. There is no absolute here.
>>656435725
>It was giving to me by the store
okay...
Usually they give these little ruins, rocks and fake plants, not a cat's skull.
Can someone please explain to me why it's so wrong to like both modern conceptual art and old figurative art? Or popular "art" and unpopular "non-art"? Why do I have to be in one of two camps?
>>656435833
You sound like a well travelled child molester.
Nice to meet you, sir.
>>656435608
Artist is Monet.
Painted during the winter in 68 near Normandy, a commune called Etretat
>>656433900
Hahaaa, my man.
>Ready to roooolll out!
>>656435978
You don't. It's all pose.
>>656435521
pretty cool, why did it take so long?
>>656434128
The story behind this disgusts me
>>656435282
is there a story behind it or is it just because it has an eerie look? Or is it one of those things thats suppose to be left to our imagination.
>>656436154
why tho
>>656436184
What is your idea behind it?
>>656435978
>Why do I have to be in one of two camps?
Just check every fandom ever.
>>656436184
I think she has polio or something
>>656436056
Thanks Anon, didn't expect that to be of a painter of that calibre. I'm humbled.
>>656436121
Straightening curves, also autism and the "gotta be perfect" mentality, even though I have no friends to show this type of shit to.
>>656436188
Just seems to glorify a lifestyle that isn't healthy
>>656435868
To a point. Some "artists" just use the explanation to pass off anything. Went to Saatchi art gallery, one piece was some underpants on a radiator with a massive explanation. Utter bullshit explained away.
>>656436358
how does that glorify anything. it seems sad as shit.
>>656436154
I'd be more worried about the smell.
>>656435642
I agree about art as a dialog. Zombie formalism is rampant right now which is the "I like it" camp. It's a huge debate in the art sphere. People making art to make money and no other reason. The ones that stick in the history books are the ones with meaning and a strong dialog
>>656436331
that....moves me
>>656436381
>underpants on a radiator
We have threads like this every day
>>656436154
i just read it and that was horrifyingly ugly. i'd kill that bitch.
>>656435991
Sounds like your reflecting your own problems on others if that's the way you read that after all the back and forth
>>656436477
"making art to make money"... really? seems there are way more artists not making money. How do you even go into art to make money?
like what sells?
>>656431965
>felix
his stuff is so generous and loving
makes me happy
http://43media.tumblr.com/post/133823698245
>>656436358
You mean sex? People do it. As long as its consensuel I fail to see the sadness.
i like going to art fairs and districts and marveling at all the jr and sr school examples being old as art
>>656431992
>albert bierstadt
thanks didnt know him
>>656436184
i think there is a story behind it but i don't remember it. i just feel tension when i look at it because the girls body looks really uncomfortable and there's like an excessive amount of light on her and then the color of the sky and houses is really uncanny and bleak, respectively
>>656436265
ahh fuck i wanted an official story but fuck it, might be a little bias
The girl has an idea of something horrific happening inside that house but she isn't sure what, she doesn't want to check it out but she knows she has too for whatever reason.
A scenario pops inside my head is i imagine her hearing a painful scream of a loved one followed by a slight alien voice of another man that isn't suppose to be there like perhaps a dangerous serial killer. She doesn't want to check on her family but she has too
>>656436381
I see what you mean, but it doesn't really matter: if there's a group of people that feels addressed by either the underpants, the radiator, the combo of that or the explanation it can pass as legit art. Its not our duty to judge other peoples emotions.
>>656433310
One of my Co workers has this has his chat avatar
>>656436784
Mainly painters that can make it in new york. It's more about 5 percent of artist making 95 percent of sales. a company paying 2 mil for a sculpture in their front yard when that could be used to fund thousands of shows for more interesting and compelling artworks
>>656435386
when i saw it there, it was located across from the coat check and ignorant people were bumping into it. it was horrifying :(
>>656437150
That's a great explanation. There's your story - and meaning.
>>656437200
Cool.
I wouldn't do it myself though.
>>656437175
"Removing the Neckbeard" by Anonymous circa 2005
>>656437354
Exactly! People didn't event take notice it seemed. But I liked the alcove it was in. I felt I could stand there alone, gazing at it.
>>656437150
awesome interpretation
>>656436331
wat
>>656435868
because youre not a goddamn writer. if you used your medium effectively the piece could make the statement effectively.
many pieces in the thread fulfill that, meaning, beauty and effort are not mutually exclusive.
>>656433563
Thats actually a really good idea lol
>>656434432
this fucking sucks
>>656435868
to address your metaphor, its not like that at all because audio is part of the movie format. its more like saying doing a silent film with a book beside it would be ridiculous because if youd used the medium to its full capacity there would be no need for a book
>>656437906
Who says I am not a goddamn writer?
Some movies can not exist without dialogue -- some perfectly can. Don't be so autismo about art.
>>656437175
the women in Renaissance art give me raging boners for some reason. they're just so soft looking and i would very much enjoy taking off their large layered clothing, it makes a woman's body seem so innocent and so holy
>>656438295
This guy is sitting at Starbucks leeching wifi and petending to be a writer on a apple laptop at 7am. I can almost correctly use my medium to paint a picture of it.
>>656433653
"Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration."
Thomas A. Edison
and so is art. Hipsters think they can reverse that ratio & make money from crap. You can fool some of the people some of the time, but the history books will call you out on nonsense in the long run.
>>656435445
>
>>656436331
is this Emma Watson ?
>>656438942
tits or gtf.. oh nevermind I see them, what the fuck are they doing all the way down there?
>>656438994
>>656438672
>Edison
>Stole ideas and made them profitable
No wonder those were his words.
>Art is about perspiration
Art is about conveying ideas and concepts that words can't cover. If you can do that with minimal effort, well done.
>inb4 words can cover all: describe taste
>>656431809
hey, i live near this painting.
>>656438672
>art is all about money
>history books matter
>art isn't already nonsense
>>656438369
its a cop out for not mastering your own craft and making your piece sufficiently succinct
>>656432988
who's is artists
>>656439347
>mastering your own craft
why is this so important to you autists?
>>656439132
>shitty vaporwave attempt
>>656439391
I think its Ilya Repin
>>656438942
Courage the cowardly dog
>>656439123
kek
Bob Ross is the only real artist ever to live. I would say goodnight but you hipsters are just starting your day with seven dollar coffees and free WiFi, so good day all you fedora touting heroes of nobody.
Enjoy your coffee.
>>656439579
its not subjective, its objective. people who arent great arent great.
My interpretation of girl with a pearl earring
>>656438295
Audio does not need to be part of the movie format. It's choice. So is explanation of art. You think too black/white.
>>656439347
Nonsense. It can be an extension of the art piece. Why should a piece of art be restricted to one medium?
>>656440444
Cute. I like it.
>>656439863
Who are you to decide what's good?
>>656431809
best thread of the week
>>656441095
FUCK YOU ANON!
Im still really sad about half-life, YES i still want it to come out.
>>656435681
gesaffelstein w.youtube.com/watch?v=yB8Ci7X5HUU
>>656441304
we all do, get over it.
check this shit bros
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0R0rZx3htI&index=54
>>656442324
Nice!
>>656434504
Thats creepy as fuck
>>656440444
wheres the earring?
>>656443990
God that's hot.
Paintings are my ecstasy.
>>656445153
>>656445403
>>656445505
>>656445641
>>656446053
>>656435011
Oh yeah this one is one of my faves. That chick has polio and can't walk
post moar
>>656432988
Those eyes unsettle me
>>656432907
Info fgt
>>656446252
>>656447518
>>656447951
>>656448091
>>656448957
>>656449146
>>656448957
Thank you anon. Fan of romanticism?
>>656441304
one of the worst games ive ever played
>>656449146
kek
Rousseau is great. And autodidact!
>>656432756
I like.
Bacon
Best thread in ages.
>>656449429
I love me some Bacon.
This triptych in memory of his husband is amazing.
>>656449668
Some Mondriaan for ya'll.
>>656449713
Such an amazing artist. My first favourite I think.
Mu Pan in great too
>>656449945
>Mu Pan Black Bear
Oh wow I didn't know Mu Pan before. Completely different, yet very impressive. Thanks!
>>656432917
Shit son. This looks great.
>>656447423
They should. He just killed his son.
>>656431809
Bump
>>656433372
Thule Society
>>656432630
>spreads his shitty hispter opinion while insulting everyone
Damn. This is next level ayyy
Marcel Dzama
No Bob Ross?
>>656433921
I don't think you're clear on the concept of "meaningful input". You should get that sorted out before you speak or try to communicate an idea again.
R e a l a e s t h e t i c s .
Otto Dix.
>>656450677
yes
>>656450677
I listened to this album when taking acid for the 1st time. it fucked me
Yiannis Psychopedis. Met the guy, he's friends with my girlfriend. Nicest guy you'll meet.
>>656434248
>>656435833
It's still pretentious garbage "art" that only enhanced douches of level 90 and above can truly give a shit about.
>>656436331
Is it art? I don't know but I like it!
>>656451092
>boohoohoo I don't like a piece of art and I am going all the way in telling you guys that
Stop please.
some people definition of art seems to encompass literally everything that exists
>>656451003
>>656437174
I see what you mean but that doesn't make it art. A pair of underpants on a radiator can move you if you relate to it in some way. Say for instance you remember seeing your underpants on the radiator in your room as a child after your dad took them off of you before sodomizing you. You may have a very visceral emotional reaction to seeing that. It doesn't mean it's art.
>>656451350
this statement is art, bro.
Fuck! So is this one!
>>656451364
I'll post what I have
>>656451745
>>656451281
see
>>656451350
I didn't say I didn't like it. I never said I didn't like it. I just said it wasn't art. It's poignant and thought provoking. That doesn't make it art.
When you call it art you make it pretentious garbage. It borders on being performance art but then I don't really consider that art either.
>>656451785
>>656451808
>>656451826
>>656451843
>>656451864
>>656451887
>>656451460
Interesting point, but it can become art, I believe, by giving context. Otherwise we start to judge art by effort. There is no definite discipline in arts: anything can be(come) art.
Take for example Rothko: he painted big squares of a solid colour and is being hailed as one of the greatest comtemporary artists. By meausure of effort he is no Van Gogh (even though he was perfectly capable of painting figuratively), yet his works are able to evoke emotions by combining certain aspects, in this case size and colour.
Lucian Freud Self-Portrait (i think)
more richter
>>656451786
Well, that's fair I guess, I personally stretch my opinion on what is art and what isn't a bit further. Not to say there's not a thing as shitty art, there's a lot of that, yet it's still art to me. Art, in the end, is nothing more or less than a display of the imagination.
>>656452179
>>656452282
Richter! Great artist. Very physical way of working. You should watch the documentary about him.
>>656452341
Redon is so imaginative - I would say playful.