Randy should have broke the streak.
>>3134358
Kevin Nash would have ended the streak if he didn't leave for WCW.
>>3134365
Nash was a bigger star than Taker ever was so this makes sense
>>3134369
true
Brock was the right guy to take it off of him
Because Brock's conquerer is going to be Reigns
they're building up Brock vs Roman as the two guys who took the power level away from Wrestlemania's Undertaker
Roman is the one getting the rub in the end and it makes sense because he's the guy
>>3134369
what? no he wasn't. Where are you getting this from?
>>3134394
Roman only beat a battered veteran with a bad hip
>>3134398
It still took him 4 spears to do so
Roman took 2 to beat Haitch and 1 to beat AJ
He's going to beat Lesnar with 5 spears
>>3134397
it's a well known fact especially in 90's.
No one should have broken the streak.
>>3134419
Or vince is going to have a field day trolling the fans and laughing his ass off by having brock just beat roman after about 50 suplexes.
>>3134397
Nash was one of the top guys in the attitude era
Undertaker was a midcarder/jobber to the stars in the attitude era
Hassan should
>>3134369
I always use the normie formula for this predicament. If you asked a random ass person who Kevin Nash was, they'd have no idea. If you asked a random person who undertaker was, there's a chance they'll know.
>>3134397
Nash never drew a dime but carder scared millions away