Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
What makes the casual view change the channel? 2017-08-08 07:33:51 Post No. 2977472
[Report] Image search: [Google]
What makes the casual view change the channel? 2017-08-08 07:33:51 Post No. 2977472
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: remote-wont-change-channels.jpg (28KB, 540x375px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 540x375px
What makes the casual view change the channel?
Anonymous
2017-08-08 07:33:51
Post No. 2977472
[Report]
I'll start with the obvious;
>indie darlings
>>
>>2977472
casual viewer*
>>
>Wrestling
>Moreso Women's Wrestling
>No Stone Cold/Rock/Cena/Lesnar/HHH
There you go its that fucking simple, Casual wrestling fans dont exist
>>
Wrestling
>>
jinder
>>
>""""""strong style""""""
Doesn't translate to an American audience other than a niche market.
>>
WCW Nitro.
>>
Gooks
>>
>>2977472
small men who don't look like stars
men who look like your next door neighbour
men with dad bods
men who aren't in shape
average/ugly looking women
fake looking flippy indie style wrestling
blatantly scripted promos
bad comedy
>>
>>2977472
>He thinks there's such a thing as a casual viewer
>>
Nia Jax
>>
>>2977500
>he thinks muh flippyshit artform or totally epic young cucks meta fighting has more appeal than strong style
UFC is the biggest combat sport in the US today. Strong style comes from MMA. Strong style would have great appeal here.
>>
>manlet geeks they can't live vicariously through
This is it really, bad booking and muh workrate don't help but casuals want to see badasses that they themselves want to be like. People were entertained by Stone Cold because he was a redneck that beat the crap out of his boss, something they couldn't realistically do.
>>
This Jason Jordan storyline.
>>
>>2977529
>muh flippyshit artform or totally epic young cucks meta fighting
That also doesn't draw.
>Strong style would have great appeal here
No, it wouldn't - it works in UFC because UFC is REAL and wrestling isn't and people know it isn't.
>>
>>2977472
Cringe promos
>>
>>2977472
I turned it off last night as soon as bayley came on.
In fact, the first time I turned on wrestling in years I saw bayley throwing a pitty party and thought wtf
>>
>>2977472
women "wrestling" in slow motion
>>
It's not short people or 'le Indy manlets xD' It's the terrible fucking dialogue and bad storylines that makes anyone embarrassed to be seen watching it. I tried getting a friend back into WWE and he just couldn't make it through 20 minutes of cringe fake dialogue and nonsensical plots over a three hour show.
Thread posts: 19
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1