People who have beaten Brock Lesnar since his return:
1. John Cena
2. Triple H
3. Goldberg
Only one of these people wasn't a part timer at the time. Why should anyone care about the roster when no one is allowed to go over Brock? Brock went over Taker at Wrestlemania instead of a young talent. People justify it by saying it makes Lesnar look strong and whoever beats him will get over, but he is probably going to lose the belt in a fatal 4-way.
WWE will still rely on part timers and old guys and refuse to create news stars, they will regret it after all the old guys retire for good
It's all for BBD
>>2905132
>>2905148
a technical win but not clean like the other 3
>MUH PART TIMERS
>MUH RUB
Stop pretending you're part of the business or a booker or something. You're a fan. Fuck off.
>>2905148
ooooo, another part timer
>>2905180
Make me, faggot
>Put the title on Lesnar to have Roman take it off of him too early.
>When people rejected Roman, he chickened out.
>The "Brock Rub" has significantly lost its allure since then.
>He's probably going to drop the belt in a fatal four way without being pinned.
>He's probably never going to put Roman over in the big singles match that Vince wants and even if he does, it'll never get the reaction Vince wants.
This really backfired on Vince, didn't it.
>>2905228
if only the dumb fans would have stuck with Roman
you all cheered him in 2014
>>2905240
>2014: Cheered Roman because they hated Batista
>2015: Cheered Rusev because they hated Roman
Where's Rusev's Rumble win, dammit.
>F5S
what did he mean by this?