Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
A "Win And You're In" Match 2017-07-05 05:26:15 Post No. 2839132
[Report] Image search: [Google]
A "Win And You're In" Match 2017-07-05 05:26:15 Post No. 2839132
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Screen Shot 2017-07-05 at 3.24.15 pm.png (869KB, 1204x1154px) Image search:
[Google]
869KB, 1204x1154px
Why can't they just call it a qualifying match? Why does the draft have to be called the "Superstar Shakeup (TM)"?
You'd never know that the average age of WWE's TV audience was over 40, considering they treat you like you're 5 years old.
>>
The average smark is about on par with a 5 year old so it makes sense
>>
>>2839132
Vince probably doesn't like how "#1 Contender" sounds
>>
>>2839132
Glad to see Deanetty got a wig. Good for him!
>>
where is jordan
>>
>>2839139
It's not a #1 Contender's match. The battle royal was. AJ/Gable was a qualifier for the #1 contender's match.
>>
>>2839132
The shake-up literally wasn't a draft, though. A draft would mean all the wrestlers were in a pool and creative picked who they wanted.
>>
>>2839132
DBs a vegan faggot
>>
>>2839132
only pajeets and infants watch these days, all 18+ have found superior feds so this is nothing surprising
>>
>>2839162
he is GM of raw
>>
>>2839187
So it's a trade then. Still not a wrestling themed milkshake.
>>
>>2839132
WWE is booked for a 70+ year old man with the sense of humor of a 7 year old.
>>
>>2839132
How was the Styles/Jordan match?
>>
>>2839187
Right, it was a raid
>>
>>2839393
90% of viewers are from Pakistan and US
>>
File: pepecima.jpg (8KB, 256x256px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 256x256px
>>2839132
>Watching WWMEME in 2017
you done fucked up OP
>>
>>2839132
>Why does the draft have to be called the "Superstar Shakeup (TM)"?
because it wasn't a draft?
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2