Does a champ with two belts only serve to devalue one of the

>>2837787
If he wins both belts in a good feud, and has a monster run with both then it's cool. But giving a loser, coward, or jobber two belts just takes up space that someone else could be using.

Lesnar is already Brock Lesnar, he needs 0 belts, all he needs to do is show up and pick a fight and it'll be the main event of the next PPV. Letting him hang on to the Universal belt is a mistake.

>>2838708
This
Shit, the main event of WM33 wasn't even a title match. Taker was above titles. The guy who ended the streak should be above titles, too.

>>2838708
The thing is, the Universal title is put on Lesnar and Goldberg to help the title, not help them.

>>2837787
It devalues them because he is a part-timer.

One of the most poignant things I remember when I listened to people discussing how NJPW makes their belts prestigious is "The IWGP Heavyweight title isn't for part-timers."

Basically a belt is prestigious if winning it is an absolute war of a match and retaining it means you're a fighting champion.

It really depends on who's holding it and how it's booked.

>>2838844
Hogan is effectively a part timer during nWo days yet he held the WCW title for like a whole year. The part timers doesn't devalue the title, the wrestlers holding it are what makes the title valuable.

>>2838808
>to help the title
>lesnar only appears every blue moon
lesnar with the belt was a mistake

>people not realizing the question didn't refer directly about Brock but about any wrestler holding two belts simultaneously

It depends if it's necessary for the storyline or the character holding them

Jericho and Lashley were ok

>>2837787
KUSHIDA holding the ROH TV title and the LEGO jr heavyweight works because they're pretty distinctly different and Kush is so awesome. Someone like ZSJ holding a bunch of literal who titles is just retarded. it depends on the wrestler