Dave Meltzer's Money in the Bank Star Ratings

>>2787558
4.5 is generous, nothing in that ppv was more than a 3.5 for me

>>2787558

Why does Dave hate Gay Cops so much?

>>2787558
>>Women's Money in the Bank: 3
it's literally a 1. the only good thing about it was the finish.

>>2787558
>Women's Money in the Bank: 3
>New Day vs. Usos: 3.25
>Jinder Mahal vs. Randy Orton: 3.5
>Men's Money in the Bank: 4.5
These are all overrated.

>>2787558
People will continue to ignore Dave overrating the fuck out of WWE while screaming about him being biased towards NJPW

File: 1484989634489.jpg (171KB, 680x967px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 680x967px

>>2787582

>one 5 star WWE match in the past twenty
>five 5+ star NJPW matches in this year alone, two of which got ratings that he made up because they made him jizz so violently
>h-he actually overrates WWE

Imagine actually believing this

>>2787594
WWE having few 5 stars and lower quality matches overall doesn't mean it isn't still overrated by Meltz on a regular basis, especially when the matches involve Charlotte, Sasha or Bayley. 3 for that crappy MITB is laughable.

File: MeVgEDc.gif (1MB, 302x268px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 302x268px

>>2787582
E Drones bashing Dave don't realize how much he tries to defend the WWE while Bryan is the one constantly shitting on it

File: Jinder-Mahal-Limo.jpg (67KB, 777x437px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 777x437px

>>2787558
Based Big Poppa Poo in the best match of his career so far. He's been improving a lot since getting his push, and will only get better

File: 1445387782402.jpg (25KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x375px

>>2787623

>Meltzer giving lower ratings to WWE overall doesn't mean he doesn't overrate them

>>2787594

He does overrate the WWE matches. Most of them aren't very good. The women's MITB sucked shit and he gave it 3 stars. He's being very generous

>>2787640

Imagine actually believing this

>>2787558
>Jinder Mahal vs. Randy Orton: 3.5

lol, what.

>>2787639
Yeah. He overrates shit matches with WWE and overrates good ones with NJPW

>>2787642

Just because you want to feel good about empowering women doesn't mean their matches are any good. It's a miracle if a women's match is average. They're not even close to on equal footing with the men and there's no comparison.

>>2787564

No Fun Allowed

>>2787637

It wasnt his in-ring work it was just good wwe writing and booking.

Two one star matches and a 2 star match. Heh heh heh. Best pro wrestling company in the world, folks. All the money in the world cannot buy good matches.

>>2787558
Naomi vs Lana was actually pretty alright. Better than a majority of the matches. 4.5 is generous af for the mitb match.

>>2787558
>Jinder Mahal vs. Randy Orton: 3.5

This would be a 5 star match if it was Jindosawa Mahatamo vs Shitsureina Ortonoto in the Tokyo dome.

>>2787558
yawn