Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: FC2002.jpg (173KB, 1001x1001px) Image search:
[Google]
173KB, 1001x1001px
Finally
>>
>all that shit on the back
every time
why wwe
>>
>Their gimmick is literally being fashionable
>Give them the same "giant unnecessary writing on the back" treatment as everyone else
>They'll have to shill for it
God fucking damn it.
>>
>>2781908
Every shirt ever has had writing on the back
>>
File: Neck Shatters.jpg (59KB, 673x528px) Image search:
[Google]
59KB, 673x528px
>>2781903
>HUGE FUCKING WRITING ON THE BACK
oh great
>>
>>2781913
It looks terrible in 100% of cases
>>
>>2781913
It looks like shit and ruins what would be an otherwise fine shirt. Just put a small WWE logo near the top and be done with it.
>>
>>2781903
Why are they still called motherfucking "Breezango"?
Call them "The Fashion Police", or something. Jesus christ.
>>
>>2781903
>you have the right to remain stylish
And then they make a shirt that violates it.
>>
Whenever I have a shirt with shit on the back like that I don't like, I wear an unbuttoned shirt over it. If I'm wearing a tee I'm keeping it casual anyways.
>>
>>2781932
Can't trademark that. Notice the shirt itself even says "Fashion Patrol"
>>
>>2781944
never realized that.
weird. they're usually super anal about copyrighting everything.
>>
>giant wwe tag on the front
>the austin 3 16 shirts they sell now have a big old TM on the front so you know they arent the same as the classic shirt
>>
>>2781972
I don't think the gimmick was supposed to get over in the way it did so they probably didn't anticipate needing a copyright.
Thread posts: 15
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4