>still no sequel Ree.

Why do people hate this game?

>>2498387
This game is unironically better than the copy and paste yearly 2K garbage.

It was the opposite of the normal WWE games. It didn't have a lot of modes and CAW was kind of limited, but the actual gameplay was fun compared to the fucking slogs that normal WWE games are

Pick new rivalries for a sequel
>Diesel vs Roman

>>2498502
>Goldberg vs Ryback

>>2498466
It really is. Super fun to play.

>>2498466
Everything is better than WWE 2k

File: 2017-03-09-220653.jpg (45KB, 960x544px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 960x544px

I could of swore I read somewhere that they were making a sequel but it got dropped cause of THQ being on the verge of bankruptcy. It was apparently gonna have tables and shit like that.

>>2498606

I think it was called WWE Brawl. It's weird. WWE Champions looks like All Stars 2, except it's a shitty puzzle game. That's disappointing. The spin-off games are usually good. I even liked Legends of WrestleMania.

>>2498502
Rollins vs HBK

>>2498613
WWE Brawl was like Power Stone, All-Stars 2 was in development too when THQ folded

>>2498387
All-Stars was and still is the GOAT. If you gave it the depth of a game like 2K17 but kept its playstyle and other quirky features like Fantasy Warfare and Path of Champions, it'd be perfect.

>>2498502
Sandman VS Ambrose?