Le Meltz's Wrestlemania star ratings

>>2495670
>AJ vs Shane MOTN
>Raw Women rated that highly
>Seth vs HHH on the level of Goldberg vs Lesnar
>Taker vs Reigns above a 2

His opinions are shit tier

Becketty btfo

NXT Takeover:

SAnitY vs Tye Dillinger/Roderick Strong/Kassius Ohno/Ruby Riot: 3.25*
Aleister Black vs. Andrade Cien Almas: 3.25*
Authors of Pain vs. DIY vs. The Revival: 4.5*
Asuka vs Ember Moon: 4.25*
Shinsuke Nakamura vs. Bobby Roode: 4.5*

Apologize to Brockgod and GOATberg now

>>2495684
>4.25
Jesus and Dave even acknowledged that Asuka was doing less than half of her usual stuff. Will the rematch get the coveted five stars?

>>2495670
Raw women's match should be a 4.

Black vs Almas seemed off to me. I would've rated it a star less.

Meltzer is honestly overrated, I listen to him because it's him but if he hadn't been around for 25 years nobody would care about his opinions.

>>2495694
"The usual" isn't always good to do.

>>2495705
I only use his ratings to seek out older matches to watch. I don't have time to waste watching every match ever to find the great ones.

>3* for that main event atrocity

Jesus Christ Dave.

>>2495685
>not even 4 stars

*laughs Stone Pitbullishly*

>>2495705
>if he didn't have the wealth of knowledge and experience he does nobody would care

What did he mean by this?

>>2495712
I know what you mean

>>2495716
What I mean is, he's just not that interesting. There are so many other people that are on the outside looking in that I wish had Meltzer's connections so that they could actually be a critic worth paying attention to. I like him he's just a pain to listen to most of the time

>>2495716
>>3* for that main event atrocity
>
>Jesus Christ Dave.

you just know he gave 1 star extra for it being Takers last match.

>>2495670
Nice source

>>2495670
>AJ Styles vs. Shane McMahon: 4*
Based BMAJ carrying Shane throughout the best match of his career.

File: 1486360931577.gif (3MB, 350x193px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 350x193px

>>2495684
>Asuka vs Ember Moon: 4.25*

I don't know why everyone worships him as a match critic. His insider info is great but I don't give a shit how he rates a match.

File: 1468003638565.webm (1MB, 892x642px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 892x642px

>>2495684
>Asuka vs Ember Moon: 4.25

File: Leatherdave.jpg (10KB, 200x251px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x251px

Women's Fatal four way is 4.25

and fat Asgooka match is 3.25

>>2495723
Big Dave is fucking hilarious.

>>2495753
And probably 'cause it was a main event with Roman.

>>2495787
Maybe cause it tried to tell a story. Botches aside, the story was great. If Taker was at least a little able to do what thex wanted to do, it would have been awesome match.

And it's end of an era. That's bonus stars. Last takers match, bonus stars.

>>2495678
Goldberg/Lesnar was better than HHH/Seth. It was my MotN.

>>2495670

That is REALLY positive.

About the only match you could say should have gotten a better rating was Corbin v Ambrose, and even then, MAYBE 2.5 stars.

In particular, there is no 4 star match on that show, the women's 4 way wasn't even 3 stars, the mixed tag could not seriously be given more than 2 stars, Wyatt v Orton should have gotten a DUD rating, and the Smack!Down women's match shouldn't have even been honored with a rating.

>>2495670
>Bray: If I were Goldberg and Lesnar, I wouldn't want to have to follow us.
Yeah, cause you almost fucking killed the crowd and the show.
Also, that's tied with the Angle match as Shane's best singles.

>>2495838
Less than five minutes and only signatures/finishers... it was literally the simplest match you could devise because Oldberg can't wrestle. That old man run up for the spear through the barricade made unbeatable WCW Goldberg seem like a different lifetime. Lesnar's jump was the only highlight in a match that was designed to react against the 1 minute 26 seconds Survivor Series match.

>>2495864
Short doesn't mean bad, neither does simplicity. You have no idea what you're talking about.

>>2495869
I respect your opinion despite the insult in lieu of an argument but I liked the Seth/HHH storyline and match a lot more.

>>2495873
You just don't know how to judge a match, I'm not insulting you.

>>2495875
It's okay if you disagree.

>>2495762
People really shouldn't. There's no complex metric he uses or some shit, he says it's literally just his opinion and based on his visceral reactions towards a match at the time. It's like taking someone's opinion on a match here to heart

>>2495822
Every match should try to tell a story.

>>2495900
Yes, but what that story was - Taker started strong, but he is too old for Roman and even if he would not let him pin him. He just coudn't continue. Could not get up. Too old. Too tired.

Maybe they wanted something else from that. Maybe they wanted Roman to give him more damage. But he (Mark Calloway) was not able to do more. Not anymore so they had to stop trying to use piledriver and maybe something more that was planned.

Anyway. For Meltzer it was 3 stars, because he was watching Undertaker for 30 years. And this was his last match.

File: styleskek.png (1MB, 1019x579px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1019x579px

>>2495670
>Neville vs. Austin Aeries: 3.75*
>Women's 4 way: 3.25*
Lmao, what the fuck.

>>2495900
And if they are able, that's whole different matter.

>>2495922
Meltzer isn't as much of a mark as you clearly are.

>>2495900
Why do kids believe this shit?

>>2495938
Post YOB now.

>>2495932
This was my second wrestlemania I saw, I am from country where wrestling is non-existent. I don't have any childhood memories of Undertaker.

But I can understand people's point and accept it and I can understand why someone feels the way they do.

>>2495941
What?

>>2495949
Just because he wasn't part of your childhood doesn't mean you're not a mark.

>>2495951
Year-of-Birth

>>2495961
1972.

>>2495961
I have seen him twice now - I don't like him, he sucks. He is too old, he should have already retired. That match was ugly. And sad. really really sad.

>>2495963
>born in 1972
>posting on 4chan

>>2495684
kek.

he's given all 3 of the matches in the DIY/Revival series 4.5 stars, even though the 2/3 falls was clearly 5 star, the triple threat with Authors Of Pain was 4 star and the regular one was 4.5.

>>2495970
You know this site is 14 years old, right?

>>2495978
That means he still would've been too old for it on Day 1.

>>2495780
>Women's Fatal four way is 4.25
Even Dave's score was generous

>>2495980
STFU newfag.

>>2495988
>he started posting on 4chan in his 30s

>>2495684
>Asuka vs Ember Moon: 4.25*
if that were true, Authors of Pain vs. DIY vs. The Revival, should have gotten 8*

>>2495780
>Women's Fatal four way is 4.25
nah, it was average at best

Oh my fucking god, what do Revival and DIY gotta do to squeeze that half star outta you, Dave.

>>2496013
Be at Tokyo Dome?

>>2496013
be in a high school gym near his house

>>2496013
no fucking idea how the 2/3 falls isn't a 5 star if this triple threat was a 4.5.

For some reason the whole pageantry and spectacle of Wrestlemania weekend cucks Dave into skewing his ratings. Keep in mind that he's there experiencing it in person and is given very good seats.

He even gave Orton/Wyatt one star too many.

>>2496239
No. He's not there. He was watching at home. He was thre before Takeover, then went home to watch it from his office.

>HHH/Rollins 3.5*
Cringe

>>2495684
the tag match not 5, his pleb

>>2495670

AJ saves the day

>>2496239
>Keep in mind that he's there experiencing it in person and is given very good seats.
Imagine going on the Internet and telling lies like this.

I am very glad he shat on the Orton Wyatt match. That match was Ambrose/Lesnar levels of disappointing.

>>2495875
Its actually you, who doesnt know.

>>2495864
>short = bad
>not 500 moves = bad
>le oldberg can't wrassle meme
this is your brain on smark

HHH/Rollins was too fucking long, and sucked in all the energy from the crowd. Ironically Goldberg/Lesnar woke up the crowd filled with smarks wake up again. Really makes you think

Dave overrates the fuck out of Nakamura

>>2495670
>Brock Lesnar vs. Bill Goldberg: 3.5*
If true that's the highest rating bills ever gotten

>>2496654
No it's not. He gave his match with Scott Steiner at Fall Brawl 2000 ****1/4

>>2495978
This nigger is 45 years old.

>Rollins vs HHH: 3.5*
Okay Dave, I get that you want to be on good terms with Paul so that you get more official information when he takes over the company. But this is fucking ridiculous.

File: Mad Kermit.jpg (4KB, 250x248px)

4KB, 250x248px

>>2495684
>Authors of Pain vs. DIY vs. The Revival: 4.5*
What the fuck is it going to take for Meltz to give out a 5 star match in the WWE let alone NXT. Is WWE seriously going to have to buy New Japan, have every damn event in the Tokyo Dome, and shoehorn Okada in the main even in order to even get a match close to 4.75.

>>2495670
What is the story behind that picture anyway?

>>2496779

>Not thinking the match fell off a cliff after DIY got eliminated

4.5 is generous. It definitely wasn't as good as their Toronto match.

>>2496788
It's shooped. It actually Okada instead of Meltz.

>Fatass v Jericho
>Haitch v Rollins
>Taker v Reigns
>not lower than 2

Meltzer is a retard

>>2496795
yeah but he gave the 3 major matches in that series 4.5.

>>2495684
>Shinsuke Nakamura vs. Bobby Roode: 4.5*

This is actually the worst.

Takeover main events are absolutely boring

>>2496779
30 minute long tlc, hell in a cell, some gimmick match that revival elevate themselve yet again in.

then again, he only gave tlc 2 4.75... so who the fuck knows. has he ever given a 5 star rating to a wwf tag match?

>4.25
Based Asuka working Dave's weeb mind

>>2496742
Are you dense? That's exactly Dave's kind of match where you work a limb, he loves that shit.

That's why HHH is one of his favorite wrestlers in WWE history going back a long time and why he gave the Roode-Nak match 4.5* its just his personal taste.

>>2497070
>That's why HHH is one of his favorite wrestlers in WWE history going back a long time

He isn't, though.

>>2497082
Yes he is

Op is fake, Meltzer here. I'll give you the actual ratings:

AJ Styles vs. Shane McMahon: 3.5*
Kevin Owens vs. Chris Jericho: 3*
Women's 4 way: 2.75*
Tag Team Ladder Match: 3.75*
John Cena/Nikki Bella vs. Miz/Maryse: 1.5*
Seth Rollins vs. Triple H: 2.25*
Bray Wyatt vs. Randy Orton: 1.5*
Brock Lesnar vs. Bill Goldberg: 3.5*
Smackdown Women's Match: 1*
Roman Reigns vs. The Undertaker: 1.5*

Didn't watch the pre show and forgot how my assistant told me to rate the matches

File: 192092091092.png (50KB, 235x237px)

50KB, 235x237px

>DURR AJ/SHANE IS GOING TO BE SHIT!!
>DURR WHY THEY WASTING BMAJ ON SHANE?!
SMARKS BTFO

File: wyc.gif (2MB, 410x230px)

2MB, 410x230px

>>2495670
>****1/4 for that
Io/Asuka will get 5 snowflakes. Based gooks BTFOing horsies

>>2497107
Io isn't coming til after tournament in summer

Its hojo-asuka that will get the 5

>>2495694
Asuka will be the first female to get 6 stars.

>>2497122
If Toyota couldn't do it then Asuka has no chance

>>2497137
Toyota got 5*+

Close enough

>>2497137

Dave has a massive hard on for Toyota that Asuka will never cause, which makes sense when you figure out his taste in wrestling. I'm surprised he's able to say Hokuto's probably better.

>>2495670
>Roman Reigns vs The Undertaker: ***
Dave........

File: 1471760301480.jpg (189KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 900x1200px

>>2495684
Based Big Match Asuka out working the entire Wrestlemania card. Anti-Smarks are SEETHING.

>>2496672
Why lie on the internet?

>>2497386
She only got like 12 minutes and didn't habe time to do all they wanted but still worked the anti-smarks into oblivion.

This is why she's the best in the world. Face the facts.

>>2497391
nah that's true