Hmm...

BASED BIG DOG SAVING WWE

>>2401526
BASED ROMAN

>>2401526
Undercarder Based

Absolutely incredible. So we know Undercarder is a confirmed antidraw, so the numbers tell us the following:

(Roman ÷ Carder) > (Randy x Bray) + (Goldberg x Lesnar).

How can smarks still deny he is GOAT after this?

File: professor steiner.jpg (20KB, 490x356px)

20KB, 490x356px

>>2401526
>>2401541
Lets break down the maths lads.
Randy/Bray are clearly lesser draws than Goldberg/Brock, and their video only has more views due to following the hype of Roman's, ensuring marks would stick around the channel, so lets set them aside.
Lets assign the numerical values of "10" to both Brock and Goldberg (Randy/Bray would be about 5/2 by comparison, this is a fair rating of their respective potentials to draw dimes).
This means Goldberg x Brock is 100, and Roman's video got roughly 2.25x the amount of views, meaning it would be 225 to their 100.
'Carder is clearly a HISTORIC anti-draw of immense proportions, so he'd he at LEAST a 25 in anti-drawing when Brock/Goldberg are a 10 in drawing.
Basically, Roman's individual value is so enormous that when divided by 25 it STILL equals 22.5x Brock/Lesnar's values and 2.25x their accumulative multiplied value.
So, with a quick multiplication (225 x 25), we learn that Roman's total individual value is 5625.
There you have it lads.
Randy = 5
Bray = 2
Brock/Goldberg = 10
Undercarder = -25
BBD = 5625

Incredible.

>>2401566
Based math.

>>2401566
BIG MATH MATHS CONFIRMING BASED BIG DOG IS A GIGA-DRAW