WM 14 vs Kane
WM 21 vs Orton
WM 23 vs Batista
WM 24 vs Edge
WM 29 vs CM Punk
WM 31 vs Bray
WM 32 vs Shane
Undertaker winning these matches had a negative impact on the business.
if you forget about the streak he should have lost at WM 17 vs HHH considering HHH beat the number one guy clean the month before...
>>2355569
hi phil
>>2355569
Undertaker should have only lost to Phill or Bray, the others wouldn't change anything, it would only make wrestlemania less apealing the following years.
>>2355583
>could have turned Orton and Batista into megastars
>could have solidified Edge as the number 1 heel
>could have allowed the far superior Kane to be the main monster
The only match he should've lost was against Orton.
if he wasn't going to lose to orton he should have never lost
>>2355589
>could have turned Orton and Batista into megastars
Are they not already megastar? Besides, his feud with Batista following WM was fantastic.
>>2355600
Orton has always been a main eventer but never really a top guy
Batista was never on Cena's level after 2005
>>2355569
>edge
>punk
I'd agree but they got injured/left a couple of years later whereas Markus is still around, so in hindsight it's a good job he won.
You're being ridiculous with the rest.
the biggest mistake is probably against Bray next is Orton
I mean come on if you're gonna call Bray the New Face of Fear then at least let him kill the Satan of WWE universe.
>>2355604
match happened in daylight it would have been shit to have him win in the sun
no mania should happen in the sun really
relevant
>>2355709
>Adam Copeland browses asp
>>2355589
They all turned down beating Take