if he's such a draw why couldn't he save TNA

1. they hired a wrestler to be a booker (always fails)
2. he was 60 years old

>save TNA
Nobody is that big of a draw

>>2286634
TNA ain't dead yet.

>>2286644

This. And I'm not even joking.

Hogan, Austin, Rock, Taker, Flair, Sting, Cena, Foley, HBK, Bret, Hall, Nash and Goldberg could all somehow magically jump ship to TNA together in their career primes, with their gimmicks intact.....and that still wouldn't have saved TNA beyond a few ratings bumps

The problem with TNA (other than their characters/storylines/feuds being mostly shit) is that its production looks too amateur compared to WWE and its crowds are too small for most people to take it seriously. After all these years they should have been built up to a point where their PPV crowds were comparable to WWE's PPV crowds.

>>2286634
He stopped being a draw around 1997

TNA got him 10 years too late