>Party's over, gramba What did he mean by this?

after this, Hogan tried to work a work and get himself into a match vs Lesnar but it turned out that Lesnar worked him into a shoot

>>2271500
hollycuck hulk chokin is fucking archaic. The cuckster BTFO by based big brock . Would have been even better if glass shattered, the crowd marked out to epic proportions, and the GOAT stone cold Steve Austin came out and stunnered both of them.

>>2271820

Hi Steve

>>2271500
Who's in the gold sequins behind Bork?

>>2271820
I can barely read this fucking post

File: Stonecucksteveaustin.jpg (149KB, 786x758px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 786x758px

>>2271820

>>2273058
Paul orndorf

>>2271845
>>2273070
>>2273071
Hey terry, still seething based steve put you out of business?

>>2273080
Hogan actually put stevettys stock out of business when he showed up and turned him into a midcarder in 2002

>gramba

Lmfao

>>2271820
hey bret!

>>2271500
I didn't know they were related

>>2271500
He meant the party is over you old bastard.

>>2271500

Hulkster should of bitch slapped that faggot for calling him out of name

>>2271500
>I still laugh at that line.

It means it's past his bedtime.

>>2273088
The only stock Hogan crashed was WWE's when his 2002 title reign drove away a million viewers from RAW who never ever came back.

>>2273305
You mean when he started feuding with Undercarder and then his title reign tanked King of the Ring and got the PPV cancelled? Yes I remember that too

>>2273088
>hoganetty sinks wcw
>returns to wwe
>gets title again
>ratings plummet

What did cuck chokin' mean by this?

>>2273305
THIS
KEK KEKGAN BLOWN B A C K

>>2271500
He meant hogan is old and his celebration has reached its end.

>>2273305
Just looked up his 2002 title run

>4/22- 4.8
>4/28- 4.4
>5/06- 4.6
>5/13- 3.9

Hogan drops the title

>5/20- 3.7
>5/27- 3.7
>6/03- 4.1
>6/10- 4.2
>6/17- 3.9
>6/24- 3.7
>7/01- 3.6
>7/08- 3.8

highest rating they did after Hogan dropped the belt was a 4.3 and they didn't even hit 4.0 one time after 8/19. The 3.9 was very low but I looked up the results for that show and the main event was Austin vs Beeg

>>2273077
Literally who?

>>2273307
>i-its all undertaker's fault!
the absolute shanty town of terry

>>2273328
Yep nobody wanted to see Undercarder in the title picture or even worse with the belt. The Rock came back and took the belt off him and the buyrate for that PPV was actually up 60k from the previous year. Rock/Brock at Summerslam 02 only lost 25k buys with 'Carder in a filler match against Test compared to the disastrous 125k drop for Taker/HHH at King of the Ring.

>>2273332
it's true

Nobody could carry Undercarder to a good buyrate or rating besides the greatest peak draw of all time Steve Austin. Hogan in 2002 had no chance

>>2273328
before hogan wins the title win
>4.7
>4.7
>4.5
>4.5
>5.3
>5.4
>4.8
>4.8

Hogan's title reign:
>4.8
>4.4
>4.5
>3.9

Hoganetty dropping dimes by the boatload

>>2273352
You realize those ratings outside of the last 3 (draft and post draft) were all when the nWo was the main angle of the show right?

The 5.3 is the famous show where he got a five minute standing ovation from the crowd and Rock buried Nash