>Goldberg will face the winner of Owens/Reigns for the belt at the show.
>Assuming this is how the title gets to the Brock/Goldberg feud
Source: Meltzer on this mornings WOR
Subscribe for more weekly content at: http://www.f4wonline.com
>>2202285
THIS IS FOR FASTLANE
>the possibility of Goldberg vs. Reigns
>the possibility that Roman gets outshone by a guy old enough to be his Dad
>>2202296
more like
>KO retains due to shenanigans
>Jobs to Goldberg in under a minute at fastlane
>Lesnar takes the title off Goldberg in the 13 minute main event
>Lesnar holds the title til Summerslam
>Roman gets the win back from Lesnar and starts his lengthy title reign
You really think they're gonna have Roman win at Rumble and have him job out right after?
I'd rather have Goldberg vs Lesnar for the Galactic title than Roman vs Taker
let's face it, we are going to have Goldberg vs Lesnar anyway and it'll probably suck but whatever
why have another shitty match for the Galactic title?
>>2202319
>implying that as soon as Roman going over Lesnar or Brock is hinted with the possibility of a match, the crowd won't start hijacking shows and rioting like it happened in the past
face it, no matter how much Vince would like it, noone else wants it, it'd always cause riots
>>2202402
>riots
They boo, WWE mutes it, people complain and nobody gives a shit after that. WWE has realized this a while ago and they don't care about what we think about their booking anymore. They get the same ratings and when they go down, all they have to do is announce some old fucknut is going to be on the show.
We're not living in the Freddie Blassie era where casuals get worked and try to legit riot. Only we get worked but do the only thing we're able to do, complain and/or stop watching.
>>2202402
Vince doesn't give a shit
>>2202412
WWE has lost well over 1 MILLION regular viewers in the past 2 years.