Who was more over?
ib the shitposting:
It's honestly too difficult to compare. Their situations are dissimilar.
Austin getting hot in late 1996 is about as close as you can get, because Bryan wasn't around or pushed for long enough to do a lengthy comparison.
Austin.
Bryan was the most over man on the roster at the height of his popularity though.
>>2181223
Austin got reactions like Bryan got vs Wyatts every week during 98-99
Can someone explain the Daniel Bryan meme to me? I stopped watching before he came on and I started watching again recently now that hes not wrestling anymore.
>>2181234
He was a believable underdog babyface with a chant.
>>2181234
Nonthreatening, emasculated vegan numale frodo.
Pandered to social media marks and the "fans make you famous so really we are the stars" snowflakes.
>>2181244
Austins "overness" literally created millions of new fans, then they left when he shook Vince's hand at WM 17
>>2181223
You're retarded. Austin is the biggest draw the WWE had and Bryan doesn't come close.
>>2181248
even my measurement of crowd loudness Bryan does not come close
unless you started watching in 2011
>>2181219
>the fucking state of this board
I'm just glad hollycuck hulk chokin wasn't included in this debate. Austin wins by landslide.
>>2181389
all Hogan got is nostalgia pops, then a few weeks later people remember he was shit and the ratings die
>>2181395
it's just carter trying to get "hollycuck hulk chokin" over for about the fourth time now, he'll give up in a few days again
>>2181219
there's no denying Daniel was over, but there's also no denying he never came close to Austin. And that's just the bottom line.
>>2181398
Not surprised it's him, a few weeks ago literally every thread on the first three or four pages had that in there
>>2181219
Literally 18+: The Post