What went wrong?

The Undercarder

They don't make it meaningful. Like remember when barret had the belt prior to losing it at 31? No? Exactly, Andre thing is the same, I forget who wins it because it has zero impact. Royal rumble winners main event wm. King of the ring gets a shitty Gimmick

>>2088892
> Started out an okay tournament
> Solid stepping stone for talent to move up to the next level
> Hit a few snags
> The "who's that" of wrestlers began winning it
> The PPV was no more, instead became a shitty Raw attraction
> Started to book the winners as jobbers making them look like jokes
> Dumb crown and cape gimmick
> Could have been something better

>>2088894
Take your forced meme and run into traffic, please I beg you. It wasn't funny the first time and it's not funny the 20 different threads you've made in the last few days. And before you spout another forced meme, in b4 SEETHING.

The undercarder

>>2088902
Yup, no stakes. The winner should get a title shot, merchandise from a WWE sponsor (Tapout), a valet, and a manservant (Virgil).

Not continuing with the format they established in 2002. In 02, the winner got a shot at the strap at Summerslam.

>Gave tournament a meaning
>Gave opportunity to build up superstars
>Built hype for Summerslam

What is not to love about that?

But alas, they discontinued it, and now its a joke.

Bork Laser

>>2088904
This

>>2088904
SEETHING

Make it mean something. Or even just a cool tournament using the whole roster.

Anything other than midcarders who all wrestle each other every week anyway with the winner becoming a comedy jobber with a crown and cape