Was Undertaker ever a true draw on his own?

>>2081044
No.

>>2081044
Not one dime.

>>2081044
Why do you think he is also known as the Undercarder?

>>2081044
Carder's never even seen a dime let alone drawn one

File: image.jpg (106KB, 642x718px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 642x718px

He was money in 1998 and 1999 but he had Big Ratings Russo to thank for that.

>>2081086
All Austin

>>2081088
hey steve

However many dimes the Undertaker drew, I just want him to stay away from Styles the coming months. This dude gets by on name alone, and hasn't been entertaining in years.

>>2081093
hey mark

>>2081086
based austin and russo carrying the undercarder

>people think Undertaker got to feud with Austin
>Austin actually got to feud with Taker
It's literally a privilege to even be allowed in the ring with Taker, you cuckmarks

>>2081099
>This dude gets by on name alone, and hasn't been entertaining in years

His feud with brock is the only thing i remember in 2015.
Their second HiAC was great.

Also the pop he got at the start of the match at SS was probably the biggest pop in 2015.

>>2081132
hey mark

Carder is pathetic and I'm glad /asp/ exposed him as the fraud he is

>>2081213
True.

There's a reason /asp/ is considered a pioneer in the IWC circle.

Wrestlemania didnt draw bad because of the Undercarder. The event was sold more on the Hart Austin match. Bret was the shit that caused the low buy rates

>>2081554
Hi Mark!

File: 14325346.jpg (27KB, 399x385px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 399x385px

>>2081559
>>2081201
>>2081102
>mfw when Carder's real name is literally Mark

>>2081554
Seriously go back and look at all the old promos for the event. They are all Bret Hart