>WWE should be pushing new stars and the old guys should be

File: doggo.jpg (665KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 2048x1536px

>Women should main event everything

>WWE has spent the last 15 years making fun of WCW for jobbing its young talent out to old guys

What happens when the old guys can't work, fatso?

File: 1451529260097.jpg (271KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 600x800px

>>2034861
What happens when the old part-timers retire though?

>The Rock doesn't wrestle anymore
>Undertaker is 51 and may retire next WM (this is said every year but it's probably happening this time)
>HHH is 47
>Goldberg is 49
>Brock is 39 but he said in his book he wants to retire young. Only has a year and a half left in his current contract.
>Cena phased out as The Guy 2 years ago and already taking the Dwayne route

All of them will be gone in 5 years. Obviously they are bigger draws than anyone on the current full-time roster but it's not like WWE gives anyone a chance.

>>2034892
Their writing doesn't give anyone a chance because no one cares about the product.

>>2034897
WWE doesn't want its guys to get legitimately over because they'd become bigger than the brand and trigger Vince's abandonment issues.