-Match was kept short not because Goldberg was hurt but because they didn't want to overexpose him in a long match. That was the mistake they did in 2003
-Goldberg needed to be the bill Goldberg of 1998. He is now by far the biggest babyface attraction, with undertaker and cena right below him.
-lesnar was on board with it , he knew the business well enough that Goldberg at mania would be a far bigger payday than Shane
-Lesnars loss will be sold as a fluke, with the idea that he still hasnt lost a long match, and meltzer says his first real loss had always been reserved for reigns
>>1991511
>his first real loss had always been reserved for reigns
BASED
Meltzer is a qt
>>1991511
Pretty much what I assumed. Me and the boys over at /wew/ knew they were going to have Brock spin Goldie's win as "dumb luck".
Shame they're going to give the rub to Roman, though. Guy has no real talent and should be an upper-midcarder at most.
>>1991520
back to wew
>>1991522
No.
>>1991523
xD! There's that classic /wwe/ humor that totally isn't unclever, unfunny and borderline autistic.
>>1991571
hi bryanlard
the day Reigns defeats Lesnar is the day WWE dies.
the ammount of record low ratings will kill the cable deal
>le meltz
>>1991511
>Lesnars loss will be sold as a fluke, with the idea that he still hasnt lost a long match, and meltzer says his first real loss had always been reserved for reigns
What is he basing this on
>>1991511
thats a lot of fluffy BS that could be more easily summed up as
>Bill Goldberg has no gas and can not wrestle anything other then a squash.
>>1993562
>His ass.
>>1993562
The fact that it would've happened last year if Reigns hadn't miserably failed at getting over?
>>1991599
This t b q h