>The Undertaker never had a good mat....

I agree. This was overrated garbage, finisher after finisher

File: taketty.jpg (196KB, 1584x691px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1584x691px

>>1953259
>The Undertaker has drawn loads of di...

>>1953275
Kek

Undercarder BTFO

>>1953275
I don't get it.

>>1953275
Taketty destroyed

Still waiting for OP to post a good 'Taker match.

>>1953275
>The Undertaker
>The only thing he ever took under was the ratings

>>1953259
Bro that's not even the best Michaels vs Taker

>>1953508

The first match was way better, the second was too short.

Truple H had a better double set of atches anyway.

>>1954312
Ground Zero and IYH Bad Blood is the best set

>>1954317

Yeah, Bad Blood is as a mtach is overlooked because of Kane's utterly amazing debut, but the match itself was pretty good.

>>1953275

The fuck happened between 13 and 14?

>>1953275

27:
>Miz as champ and the Rock as a ceremonial waste of time, fuck that
28:
>OMFG ROCK IS COMING BACK TO BURY CENA SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY
29:
>Oh joy, Twice In a Lifetime Two: Electric Boogaloo. Fuck Cena and fuck The Rock

It's amazing how this company killed The Rock's drawing power in a single fucking year.

>>1953275
>WM 19
>Lance Storm beats Kane
>Booker T gets buried
>Vince vs Hogan

Clearly Undertaker is to blame

>>1954336
a guy called stone cold steve austin

>>1954336
Leafs left the company

File: stone_cold_steve_austin_01.png (1MB, 820x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 820x1024px

>>1954336

>>1954364
>>1954366
How can one man be so based?

>>1954408
British genes

>>1953278
Undertaker headlined Wrestlemania 26, which had the lowest buyrate since wrestlemania 19.

>>1954336
*glass breaks*

>>1954364
>>1954366
>>1954503
18+

Tyson had a far bigger impact, mainly because he was a loose cannon who just got banned from boxing so people wanted to see what the fuck he was going to do. Austin became a megastar a few months after

>>1954509
shut the f up

>>1954514
oh

>>1954336
13 was main evented by Undercarder
14 was main evented by Austin

>>1954434
"Main events" haven't been the main draw in WWE in many years, mate. Why do you think they have three a PPV now?

>>1954509
lol you're a fucking idiot, nobody thought tyson would do anything

>>1954696
Shhh, he believes that LT def. Bam Bam was a smart business move

>>1954696
>>1954698
once again, 18+

RAW didn't beat Nitro in the ratings one time leading up the WM14, and No Way Out 98 got 189k buys which while decent, doesn't add up to the WM14 buyrate. Meanwhile Tyson/Holyfield 2 did 2 million buys a few months before 14. Tyson was the clear main draw

>>1954703
>thinks LT vs. Bam Bam helped the WWE
>being plus eighteen

lmao dude, if you watched back then or even did the slightest research you'd see how silly you look right now

>>1954434
The other headline matches were Edge vs. Jericho & Cena vs. Batista.

Oh, and speaking as somebody who actually watched it live: nobody knew what the main event would be until hours into the show.

>>1954707
Who the fuck cares about LT vs Bam Bam? I replied to you because you were implying that I was wrong about Tyson being the biggest draw for 14

>>1954710
I was implying that you think LT def. Bam Bam was a good idea. Learn how to read you fucking idiot. I said nothing about Tyson.

>>1954703
Well you weren't alive back then so fuck off LMAO

>>1954707
>>1954713
He didn't even mention LT in that post you illiterate schmuck. What's the matter with you?

>>1954713
So why did you reply to the guy saying I was wrong about Tyson? Nobody brought up WM11 before you

>>1954714
Actually yes I was, and I know how big of a star Tyson was back then. The fact that people are comparing his starpower back then to a two year retired NFL player shows that they were the ones who weren't around back then

>>1954715
I never said he did. So what's your point?

>>1954720
That you have a severe level of mental degeneration.

>>1954719
Who cares if I was the first to mention it? Are you that autistic? Are you capable of thinking about more than one thing every six hours?

>>1954724
Because you can't read? Sure thing, kid.

>he mentioned a different subject so he must be retarded

You must be homeschooled

>>1954725
Because nobody gives a shit about it and Tyson as a celebrity and a draw was on a different planet to LT. Tyson was actually a good idea as you can see from the WM14 buyrate, LT was not

>>1954727
So that's all you had to say in the first place instead of shitting yourself because someone didn't reply to a post that replied to you with the exact same subject matter as your post.

Jesus fuck kid grab your inhaler.

>>1954730
You replied to him because you assumed that I thought all celebrities were good for WWE, don't try and back out of it now m8

>>1954734
No, I replied to him because I assumed you think LT vs. Bam Bam was a good idea. Again, learn how to fucking read. I didn't type anything that you can't read in my post so don't assume there's some secret illuminate reference deep inside my post that implies something I didn't say if you read it backwards in Chinese with a Spanish accent. Learn how to fucking read kid. All you had to say was "no I don't" and that would have been the end of it but instead you got all red faced over literally fucking nothing. Learn how to have a conversation with real life people.

>>1954736
>I assumed you think LT vs. Bam Bam was a good idea

And why was that? Because I said Tyson was a good idea, he has zero in common with LT besides being a celebrity and being black. It's ok m8

>>1954708
Exactly

The mere chance of a taketty main event killed the buyrate

Hence why from 27 onwards they make sure to announce the main event at least a month in advance

>>1954698
>>1954707
>>1954713
>>1954726
>>1954730
>>1954736
holy shit the state of this nutjob

>>1954739
Because I can. Get over it. Learn how to have a discussion.

>>1954698
Nice strawman faggle

>>1954745
I do know how to discussion, I don't bring up random people that don't have anything to do with the one at hand

>>1954745
go >>>/out/side

>>1954750
>how to discussion

whoops I set myself up for that one

>>1954752
That's literally what I've been saying the whole time. Learn how to read.

>>1954750
It's called a different subject, mate.

>>1954336
Taker wasn't in the main event

>>1954767
>everybody else besides me is wrong

'Tismo.

>>1954740
lol fuck off
The only draw for WrestleMania the past 10 years is the name itself, no one 'draws' anymore

>>1954799
Wrestlemania 28 alone disproves this