>It was the smarks that ruined wrestling for everybody

Yes it was Trilbryan

bad writing ruined wrestling

WWE really needs to let a guy like Russo come in again and write some crazy shit

>>1895089
>complains about bad writing
>LET'S HIRE RUSSO

>>1895098
>le Russo is a bad writer meme
Fuck off, Russo's a good writer. His problem is that he doesn't know what will get over with the crowd or not

>>1895108
>le Russo is a good writer meme

Explain to me how narrative inconsistency on a fundamental level is "good" writing.

Smarks = cancer

>>1895108
>His problem is that he doesn't know what will get over with the crowd or not
That makes him a shit writer, anon.

I think Jim Cornette's a cunt in a lot of cases, but "The Archbishop of Talent Burying" is the best nickname anyone's ever given Russo.

>>1895161
Do you know that wrestling is fake?

Do you enjoy it regardless?

Do you talk about the ins and outs of the business?

Then you're a smark.

>>1895377
No I'm not. Smarks are fat nu-males

Catering to smarks ruined it. Not the existence of smarks itself.

I've said this before, WWE started slipping when they acknowledged the antics of the post-wrestlemania crowd. They not praised that shit but also encouraged it blatantly. They even announced a fucking slammy for that kinda crap. In reality, what they should've done is fight this menace to its core. Fans controlling the show is not and never will be good for any business. It never works. WWE should've fought it but instead they caved in to this menace like a fucking chinese whore. It was all downhill from that point.

>>1894989
>implying there is a single proof of this not being the truth