>Top 100
>undercarder didn't even make top 50
>/asp/ies think "all time" means the last 30 years
>>1886966
Meltzer is using a different definition of "draw".
Technically speaking, Taker drew money in the sense that he ME'd a lot of shows, though they didn't do good business for him being on-top – often the inverse.
As an example:
Austin headlines Show A, does 2,000 buys
Taker headlines Show B and C, does 1,100 buys per.
By Meltzer's logic, Taker has drawn more than Austin, but really, he's not nearly as big a draw.
tl;dr undercarder never sketched a penny
>>1886991
>he thinks all time doesn't go back to the "Fallen God" Milo of Croton
still drawing to this day, faggot
>if Meltzer says something I like I post it
>if Meltzer says something I don't like I post >le Meltz
>>1887005
Meltzer is always a good source unless Flair is involved, people say he hates Hogan/Nash/HHH but he usually gives them their due. He is extremely biased towards Flair mainly because Flair was a big source for him.
>>1886969
Why'd they kiss?
>>1887005
/thread
Big Dick Dave working the s/marks.