Didn't Brock lose his UFC debut too?

>>1746804
This argument again.

>>1746804
- Not as bad

- Not in UFC.

>Comparing a freak of nature like Lesnar to Cuck Master Punk
lol k

it wasn't his first fight ever though

and also phil has already been cut from the roster, dana immediately said after the event his next fight shouldn't be in the UFC and he should go to a smaller promotion

Brock was about 10 years younger than Phil
Brock has been a lifelong athlete
Brock didn't get utterly humiliated

He was already a proven shooter from his NCAA days, Punk was just a pro wrestler.

And he made Mir his bitch in the rematch for what that's worth.

>>1746804
Lesnar looked good in his first UFC fight vs a former champion
Punk got completely destroyed by a kid

lesnar never fought a gracie jj brown belt

you punk haters dont know shit about mma. mickey gall is a future ww champion

>>1747182
Lesnar fought a black belt

File: 1472655211761.png (54KB, 500x534px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x534px

>>1746804

>>1747193
i said BROWN BELT you dummy.

CmPunk Best in The World

>>1746807
His MMA debut wasn't in UFC, but the question is about his UFC debut.

>>1746804
Brock also fought a 2 time UFC champion in his first fight. Brock also dominated Mir in the fight. Brock made a rookie mistake, and Mir was able to apply a submission on him. Punk just got completely destroyed by a average at best UFC guy.

>>1747212
not everybody wins their UFC debut, in fact 50% of tuf competitors lose their UFC debut because that is the nature of the competition, yet nearly 100% of them ultimately end up with UFC contracts anyway
this is because they have proven their value a professional fighters by holding winning records