What are your thoughts about Backlash? To me, it felt like a 3 hours SmackDown.
Top to bottom, it might've been the best main roster PPV all year. I dunno, Battleground was really good too.
>>1745334
It was much better than summerslam.
Only the usos were bad tonight but im biased. I dislike them so much. At least their double team suplex was cool.
BMAJ was the only high point of the show. Tbqhfam.
Surprisingly, the Bad-Usos vs Hype bros wasn't too bad and watchable. The rest was fast forward material.
>>1745334
Not a single bad match. They weren't all great, but none of them were boring.
A perfectly above-average PPV that was much better than it should be because the crowd was fucking hot for everything all night long.
Prolly will be in my Top 5 for PPVs this year. Loved the matches, booking, crowd, and pacing. It felt very refreshing after the fucking slog that was SummerSlam
>>1745334
5 star ppv
mitb was also good
Unfortunately I am hawe found out about it last second ,,, but I read result . Novv I vish I savv it because AJ Stiels he is vvinning , a lot of people in my village don't care about AJ Stiels because he is not big strong or hawe many muscles but I heard rumor he is against the gay GLT mowement so I subbort him .
>>1745334
surprisingly good ppv. I think having 6 divas in a match at once should be the standard. Much less of a drag when the focus is not on a 1v1
>>1745334
It would've been perfect with better presentation. It looked EXACTLY like Smackdown with a different logo on the ring apron. A PPVs set is important to how big the show will feel. The grandiose sets is the reason why even a non-fan can tell that Wrestlemania looks more important just by looking at the presentation.
Not only that, there seemed to be a lot of empty seats due to Smackdown being booked pretty terribly and having Dean as the champ made the show not really worth watching, and therefore had Backlash's buildup basically skipped over.
All my problems with Backlash were in presentation, but everything was booked totally great.