Who was the draw on this card?

Trips, Brock, The Undertaker

Roman, The Rock

>>1617798
The fact alone that it's a Wrestlemania is a draw in itself, it doesn't really matter who they put on there it'll still sell out

>>1617798
Taker and Lesnar

>>1617810
This

28 was the last time a specific name drew (Rock). 29 did a disappointing buyrate, and the draw of 30-32 was "Wrestlemania"

>>1617807
go to bed vince

>>1617810
This

>>1617798
Always Taker

>>1617817
Daniel Bryan was the draw for 30, 95% of the event was literally about him

The name of the show

>>1617850
the post-AE wrestlemanias fluctuated between 680k to 1.25m buys but ok lol

>>1617810
it never sold out

>>1617810
God I love the morons on here who don't understand a lick of business.

>>1617798
Undertaker, Lesnar

>>1617906
Yeah because it selling out months in advance of knowing who's on the card really demonstrates how the Wrestlemania name isn't the draw.

>>1617906
He's mostly right.

File: 2vipcaa.jpg (196KB, 1584x691px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1584x691px

The Rock and Donald Trump are the only draws.

Taker Shane.

I remember a news that when they announced the match the ticket sales went bananas.

File: 1471285637786.png (249KB, 353x332px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 353x332px

>>1617801
>Trips
>mfw

He was the reason ratings went to shit post AE and literally nobody gives a fuck about him.

I even think Roman was the bigger draw in that match and i fucking hate Roman

>>1618060
It didn't sell out you fucking dolt. There's a big difference between actually selling out and having to hand 10k tickets for free, and there's also a big difference between 885k buys and 1.1m

>>1617798
Whoever the draw is, he'd better not associate himself with the potential winner of "Worst PPV of 2016"

>>1618120
I think that draw is perfectly fine with associating himself with
> the event grossing $17.3 million for WWE's highest grossing live event, and surpassing the previous year's $12.6 million.

>>1618158
I think we can all agree those numbers are pathetic considering the possible audience. Adjusted for inflation WMV would have done 10 million PPV buys. Wrestling is dead.

>>1618166
No, I don't think we can all agree on that.

>>1618168
>mfw some people are retarded

>>1618174
Don't see how setting a live gate record can be considered pathetic, but that's just me

>>1618176
Talking about PPV buys.

>>1618189
Doesn't matter too much at this point with the network.

>>1618191
It's the exact same thing. How many people have the network? How many COULD have the network? How many would have had the network in 88, or 98? WWE is literally dead, both because of their own doing and because of a changing culture

>>1618196
I'm not arguing that wrestling is dead, but if you think the WM brand isn't stronger than it was in the past there's no arguing with you. Clueless.

>>1617798
Women's wrestling

File: merely a ruse.jpg (15KB, 325x184px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 325x184px

>>1618120
>>1618166

>>1618197
>WM brand is stronger
>Branded itself as "pop culture extravaganza"
>Highlight is a veteran shooting flamethrower for no reason
Keep eating shit

>>1618208
You truly are some kind of stupid.

>>1618208
>>Highlight is a veteran shooting flamethrower for no reason
What in the fuck does that have to do with WM still doing strong revenue?