Reminder that both Sports Illustrated and the New York Times

Go away melt

>>1580217
>New York Times
Probably the only thing worse then Meltzer's predictions.

Please have sex Dave

>>1580217
Because he is literally the only big dog in the field of pro wrestling, due to how underdeveloped it is as an overall niche.
Every other journalist has a bustling field of writers to contend with. Meltzer's biggest competition is directly under his thumb, because he arrived early and set up shop before anyone else could.
He's the fat kid who takes up the entire back-row at the bus. No wonder he's getting the seat named after him when he has a heart attack.

You can tell he's into weird porn fetish

Meltzer is great. I trust his opinions more than any pro wrestler. It's the same debate going on in the field of sports where journalists are getting more respected versus the actual athletes in their views of the game.

>>1580217
This is the same Sports Illustrated that just put out that top 101 wrestlers list, right? I doubt that Meltzer would appreciate you drawing a connection between him and them at the moment, because they don't care enough about wrestling to report on it seriously.

>>1580217

>jew parasites onto an baseless entertainment industry
>after 30 years can still only barely string together a sentence
>fellow kikes call for him to be lauded
>manlet

Fuck heebs.