Step 1: Find your way to Google Trends.
Step 2: Enter your search terms to compare.
Step 3: Invoke the blessing of our lord and saviour, Edge. (In other words, make sure that you're looking at google's analysis of searches for a topic, not the raw terms or else you'll get something like this picture.)
Step 4: Screencap and share your results!
In case you wanted to know who is less relevant out of Russo and Cornette, here's the fact of the matter.
In another thread, someone was claiming that Sienna (Allysin Kay) and Allie (Cherry Bomb) are more over than Gail Kim. Looks like they aren't.
Here's something for WWE creative to ponder as they desperately try to get Roman Reigns over.
Sasha garnered more interest than Becky even while she was off TV and much more interest when they were both in the same Wrestlemania match.
>>1568294
Autism
Stephanie Still remains the most popular.
>>1568316
use topic
>>1568310
>>1568316
These were not blessed by the hand of Copeland. The first one works out fine because those terms correspond very closely to interest in the people represented. The second is not good for Stephanie, because when I asked google to look at interest in the topics, this happened.
Womens Wrestling, I'm told it's really popular and a real draw.
Thought so.
>>1568316
>putting "sasha wwe" instead of "sasha banks" to manipulate the result
Nice try buddy.
>>1568339
what did he mean by this?
>>1568337
>becketty
its a shame paige is wasting away because of her behavior though
>>1568339
Obviously when you compare a specific search to a more general search on the same topic, the general term is going to win out. That is why Lord Edge commands anons in this general to use topic rather than search term comparisons.
More detailed analysis suggests that the divas have some drawing power. Certainly, if you think that AJ Styles is a top guy (and while there's some debate about that, a lot of people do) the fact that there's more interest in Paige than in him should be something to ponder.
>>1568348
Great rebuttal.
>>1568355
but all of this is bullshit.
Nobody is searching for naked pics of AJ Styles so these results are skewed in favour of women anyway.
Sasha Banks ... Muh Dick
>>1568359
>Nobody is searching for naked pics of AJ Styles
It has long been known that AJ Styles has quite a following in the gay community.
>>1568355
google shopping would at least suggest aj moves more merchandise however. regardless paige would still rate highly among the roster
>>1568355
you are a fucking idiot.
You think the trends eg; how much people have searched that term means actual interest you fucking retard.
try looking at merch sales
honestly some of the faggot virgin neckbeards on here will do anything to legitamise womens wrestlers/wrestling
>>1568364
We all know it's meaningless. It's just a bit of autistic fun.
>>1568363
Yeah, google trends is like a bikini. It reveals some things, but not everything.
>>1568364
>being this triggered
Did you get beaten up by girls when you were in school or something? I was just saying that you'd used a bad method.
To help you calm down, here's an image showing how WWE dominates UFC in the public eye. Isn't that something we can all be happy about?
>>1568370
>being this triggered
Told him using Google trends means nothing and posts another example of how much of a fucking retard he is.
Not triggered by girls but by stupid virgin faglords like you.
Have Sex.
>>1568381
>faglords
He has used the F word twice guys I think he is from /b/
>>1568385
hello ribbit
>>1568370
>>1568381
>>1568381
>getting triggered by graphs
Oh, right, you flunked maths. Well, if the mention of statistics triggers you, just hide the thread, because this is Search Terms General and there's going to be a lot of charts from google trends here.
Speaking of which, predictions that ICW had completely eclipsed TNA in the UK seem to be a bit premature. (Including WWE turns them both into little smears on the bottom of the chart, of course.)
>>1568408
based dean
SKANKS/BECKETTYFAG BTFo
>>1568408
He struggles against Paige. Sasha would be ahead of him at the moment. (I'd screencap that but I'm lazy and it can be inferred from other charts in this thread.)
>>1568390
ayy lmao smacucks btfo'd
>>1568390
I wasn't watching WWE back in 09, what's with the massive spike in SD
>>1568434
The double homicide
JOHN BTFO
>>1568425
Paige is too general a term/name.
Try Paige WWE.
>>1568452
that then searches Paige and WWE though
This may be the most autistic thread on the board right now
>>1568452
he is using the topic function for both, its already doing the filtering
>>1568348
Is this b8?
I can see someone thinking this is a legit retort, here.
>>1568452
As noted by >>1568476, I was using the search topic function. Here's a comparison of "Paige" the search term against the topic for Paige the wrestler.
>>1568487
most of the people in here are full retard, it's already been stated that there will be a lot of searches for women based on people looking for fap material.
And as you stated Mens Wrestling is not a thing as no one says that. its Wrestling and Womens Wrestling, Men default as Wrestling as it is the standard.
>>1568487
42 Replies
15 Posters
says everything
>>1568391
No shit those averages are from 2004
>>1568496
>based on people looking for fap material.
this still has value though
>>1568496
OK. Let's try getting an idea of how much fap searches are contributing to overall interest.
>>1568499
In fairness, several of those posters are shitposters who popped in to rage that people are having fun on /asp/ rather than responding to bait.
Based one man band
cenawinslol
>>1568513
You're cheating, but that is pretty great.
>>1568501
Last 12 months
>>1568549
Based Roman, still the third biggest star behind Cena and Brock.
>>1568557
He's also behind The Rock, and has only just caught up to The Undertaker. Considering how much has been invested into Roman, it's a worrying sign for WWE that he's not getting more buzz.
>>1568566
He's surpassed the Undertaker from what I'm seeing.
Rock, Cena, Brock are three biggest stars right now. The fact that Roman is so close to them in under 2 years of push, is a major accomplishment.
>>1568577
>He's surpassed the Undertaker from what I'm seeing.
It's marginal on the average. Also bear in mind that this is worldwide searches. Roman is level with Cena in India, but lags far behind in US-based searches.
As for this being great for a two year push? Not really, because they spent two years building him up in the Shield first. Warrior took a year to start knocking on the main event scene and was above anyone but Hogan in two, and that's dating from his debut in the company. Cena's timeline from debut is pretty similar, as is the Rock's.
>>1568408
>he has to compare Dean with a fucking woman for him to have a chance
lmao