Thread replies: 39
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10
File: fantasyppvschedule.png (656KB, 753x2310px) Image search:
[Google]
656KB, 753x2310px
Discuss
>>
File: reddit.png (97KB, 263x263px) Image search:
[Google]
97KB, 263x263px
>I fantasy book a childrens show
>>
File: Ambrose - Thumbs Up Idiot.gif (995KB, 300x289px) Image search:
[Google]
995KB, 300x289px
>>1566158
Yes. I have. Your point?
>>
>>1566184
Have sex nerd
>>
>>1566199
I have. It's pretty great. She's into wrestling too, so get worked, scrub.
>>
>>
Royal Rumble, Wrestlemania and Summerslam
That's all I would care about
>>
>>1566303
Can't say I blame you.
>>
>>1566205
>I had sex last night
>>
>>1566330
Good job?
>>
>>1566205
Ya hand is not a girl nerd
>>
>>1566351
I am aware of this.
>>
>>1566351
>>1566370
>Ya
>Projecting this hard
You're making the FANTASY BOOKER look better than you. Come the fuck on.
>>
>>1566380
How do ya even live being so short? Do ya gotta carry a stool everywhere to reach things?
>>
File: CM Punk - Stare.gif (1MB, 199x166px)
1MB, 199x166px
>>1566370
What would I possibly gain by lying to you? I don't speak in lies, I speak in truths. Doing otherwise is just pointless, my dude.
>>
>>1566392
I dont know ya tell me.
>>
File: 1469569115965.gif (1MB, 180x200px)
1MB, 180x200px
>>1566385
I usually tell your mother to get off my dick long enough to get it for me.
>>
>>1566068
¿Where is Clash of Champions / Night of Champions?
7/10 Smackdown looking retro as fuck with those choices
>>
> namefag
> replying to cuckter without BTFOing him
Why?
>>
>>
>>1566419
Would be quite funny if you knew what bargaining meant
>>
File: fuckoff.png (19KB, 777x249px) Image search:
[Google]
19KB, 777x249px
>>1566394
I would gain nothing. Obviously.
>>1566405
I must be a jobber, LOL.
>>1566419
Wait. Why do you think >>1566395 is me? It's not, you fucking retard. Pic related, you jackass.
>>
>>1566396
I don't like either of those PPVs. And I tried to keep RAW in line with their previous PPV schedule so SmackDown would be *gasp* a new and exciting product, like they said it would be.
>>
Elimination Chamber as a PPV was a fucking awful idea, which is why all the best ones happened pre-2006
>>
>>1566484
You may be right, but I like the idea of having two cage-based PPVs back to back. It's probably a fair criticism tho.
>>
>>1566068
daily reminder carter enjoy watching penises on leddit
so don't reply to that faggot
>>
>>1566493
A lesson I have surely learned from this thread. But thanks for the reminder anyways.
>>
File: 1466748475988.jpg (105KB, 1300x1128px) Image search:
[Google]
105KB, 1300x1128px
>>1566499
>A lesson I have surely learned from this thread. But thanks for the reminder anyways.
>>
>>1566068
First off, I'd get rid of the Special Match Type centred PPVs. That way, whenever special matches DO occur, they're for better storyline reasons and they're not shoehorned in to meet their respective PPV
Let's say it's 2018
January:
Royal Rumble [Raw/SD!]
February:
Fastlane [Raw]
No Way Out [SD!]
March:
Backlash [Raw]
Roadblock [SD!]
April:
WrestleMania [Raw/SD!] (MITB returns to WM)
May:
Payback [Raw]
Judgement Day [SD!]
June:
Vengeance [Raw]
Great American Bash [SD!] (Late June/Early July)
July:
SummerSlam [Raw/SD!]
August:
Vengeance [Raw]
Battleground [SD!]
September:
Unforgiven [Raw]
No Mercy [SD!]
October:
Survivor Series [Raw/SD!] (After over a year's absence, an Elimination Chamber match is booked in the original PPV it first happened in)
November:
Night of Champions [Raw]
Armageddon [SD!] (Late November/Early December)
December:
New Year's Revolution [Raw] (Late December/Early January)
New PPV concepts for Dry patches in the calendar:
WWE Attitude
>TV-14 for one night a year only
>More High Risk Matches
>Blading is allowed only at this PPV (Still no direct head shots with Objects, so Wrestlers would have to get creative)
>Swaps between the two brands yearly
>Venues are smaller with a hardcore feel
>>
>>1566509
autism
>>
>>1566509
You have Vengeance on there twice, but other than that, I can dig it. Attitude might be a hard sell though.
>>
>>1566509
Oh, I forgot the second concept
WWE Infinity
>Raw or Smackdown wrestlers (or sometimes Hall of Fame Legends) are matched with NXT Wrestlers
>Some Main roster wrestlers might tag with an NXT Wrestler against another combination
>Pushes an Old vs New vibe
>Main event is always Current WWE or Universal champion vs NXT champion
>Maybe a triple threat between the three if there's calendar room for another joint PPV
>>
>>1566534
Huh. Interesting.
>>
>>1566534
Fascinating
>>
>>1566534
>>1566509
I like these concepts and you're 100% correct that the themed PPVed need to GTFO
I would finally bite the bullet and make Wargames the featured contest of Survivor Series, as bad as Extreme Rules, MITB and HIAC have become Survivor Series is 100 times worst, and I would make 4 one night tourneys (CWC, King and Queen of the Ring and Dusty Tag Team Memorial) on a Saturday on the months with one PPV.
>>
File: 1469578413352.gif (2MB, 173x200px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 173x200px
>Royal Rumble [Both]
>No Way Out [Raw]
>Wrestlemania[Both]
>Backlash[SD]
>Payback[RAW]
>MITB[Both]
>Vengeance[SD]
>Summerslam[Both]
>Night of Champions[RAW]
>Halloween Havoc[SD]
>Survivor Series[RAW]
>December to Dismember[SD]
Having two events a month is a terrible idea, overexposure was what caused brand split PPVs to be stopped.
MITB is both because the idea is still good for a back-up champion if the current one sucks/gets injured.
Survivor Series isn't both because it has last all of it's prestige, MITB is far more relevant
>>
>>1566816
>overexposure was what caused brand split PPVs to be stopped.
that was a problem in 2003 when the WWE expected you to spend $50 - $100 a month but since most of the PPVs will be on the network and they need ongoing live content to justify the price especially if the WWE decides to ever up the subscription price
Thread posts: 39
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10