Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
How Did The First WWE SmackDown Live Of The Draft Era Do In The Ratings? 2016-08-01 11:56:17 Post No. 1544500
[Report] Image search: [Google]
How Did The First WWE SmackDown Live Of The Draft Era Do In The Ratings? 2016-08-01 11:56:17 Post No. 1544500
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: maxresdefault.jpg (151KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
151KB, 1920x1080px
How Did The First WWE SmackDown Live Of The Draft Era Do In The Ratings?
Anonymous
2016-08-01 11:56:17
Post No. 1544500
[Report]
> The ratings are in for Tuesday's SmackDown Live, and the first bluebrand show of the post-draft era brought in a total of 2.743 million viewers.
> This number is down from the draft show the week before.
> WWE Smackdown Live on USA Network drew a 1.92 rating and viewership of 2.743 million viewers. This is down from last week’s 2.20 rating and down 447,000 viewers.
> Raw drew a 2.36 rating on Monday night, so the new “ratings battle” kicks off with Raw with a 19 percent lead over Smackdown.
Deannitty 1.87 does it again.
>>
>>1544500
How were the ratings pre-Live?
>>
>>1544500
Top kek, how will Smacucks ever recover
>>
He wasn't even on the show though
>>
>>1544511
But everyone knew he was the champion and it would be reasonable to assume viewers would've expected him to be on the show.
>>
>comparing the ratings for the first live show to a draft special that would have raw viewers who usually skip smackdown tuning in
the ratings are up from pre-taped smackdown and that's all usa and wwe really care about
>>
>>1544525
Yes and? Are you assuming viewers didn't watch because Dean has the belt?
My guess would be the first 6 minutes of the show sucked and they tuned out
>>
>>1544505
pre-live before Draft 1/7/2016 drew: 2,757,000 viewers. Essentially the same.
>>
>>1544531
I hate to break it to you, but i think Deanetty likes women, so you don't need to act like Deanetty's dick is up your ass.
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1