Do you think he would make a better booker than HHH/Vince?

depends how much freedom he has

He would steal all the money and the company would be dead in 5 years max

>>1536162
this

remember when he disappeared from ECW to go film a shitty movie called Rollerball?

>>1536158
Depends if he is still ahead with the times.

Not for smarks since he can't book muh women wrestlers as anything more than eye candy

>>1536158

I would love to see Heyman get one last good long run as head booker of raw or smackdown.

>>1536162
Everyone forgets about how much of a rat Heyman is because muh promo and booking

>>1536208
>Heyman
>not viewed as a god by smarks
18+

>>1536158
Maybe he could be the best as the creative team head honcho, but keep him far away from the money.

>>1536158
He's massively overrated as a booker. Maybe not as shit and out of touch as Vince is these days, but he wouldn't make WWE great again.

File: 0da27e57adcfd31a4650bc17578b4bee.jpg (71KB, 1024x512px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x512px

Do you think he would make a better booker than HHH/Vince?

He made Smackdown God tier during ruthless aggression, and it was his decision to bring in a young Brock Lesnar. So why not again?

It'll never happen though. Heyman says he'll never be a booker again unless given full creative control. Vince would never agree to that of course.

>>1536158

you wouldn't be asking this question if you used to watch Smackdown 12 years ago.