Roman and Charlotte blown the fuck out!
>>1430863
>Record low and a botch monkey
All I see are two balding no-draws with an angry manchild fanbase
>>1430869
I thought Roman held the record low spot?
>Raw did 3.09 million viewers, the lowest number on a night without major team sports competition since 1997 .
>>1430879
>botches eating popcorn
HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH
HOW IS HE THE WHC!?!!?
HE'S SO SHIT
PUT THE BELT ON AJ PLEASE VINCE
>>1430863
>he lost 500k viewers in one week even when there was no other sports on
JUST
>>1430863
Tonight on SD Deano
>Deepthroats a Cuban
>Praises how much protein said Cuban has
>Gets kicked in the nuts 3 times by the Miz while Mauro calls it the 'wine cellar"
>>1430879
>Implying 3.09 with no sports on is bad at all
Considering the WWE has had a 2.03 this year, I'm suprised 3 million people are still interested to watch this shit fest with no major sportd
>>1431190
>this fucking retarded deancuck still hasn't figured it out
Holy fuck what is your actual IQ. How stupid are you. When did raw get 2.03 million, tell me
>>1430876
he is just romarks dont care
>>1431194
http://www.topropepress.com/news/30226/wwe-raw-ratings-61316
Here FedoRoman
>>1431202
>deancucks are actually this fucking retarded.
read the first fucking sentence
>>1431203
>Romark is too fat and lazy to read past the 1st sentence
>The final cable broadcast rating for RAW came in at a 2.03, which is also down from last week’s show that did a 2.28 (and 2.19 two weeks ago). The 2.03 number is the lowest RAW rating since the March 3, 1997 show drew a 1.9.
>>1431208
Ramen with the belt...so ofc it would be the lowest
>>1431212
Notice how Romark stopped replying
>>1431208
>this fucking damage control
>>Implying 3.09 with no sports on is bad at all
>Considering the WWE has had a 2.03 this year, I'm suprised 3 million people are still interested to watch this shit fest with no major sportd
>actually comparing ratings numbers to viewership numbers instead of viewership numbers to viewership numbers
absolute moron
>>1431217
1431217
>Romark damage control
>Roman not on RAW week before
>3.25
>Roman on RAW the next week
>2.03
>>1431234
B-but my no major sport...
>The state of romarks
>They think that there's any legitimate reason for 2 mil being better than 3.
>>1431282
>3.25 million viewers
>2.03 tv rating
this is your last reply, enjoy it. literal sub-1 iq retard
So lete get this straight, you faggots try to use TV ratings to try to prove which children's TV character is the strongest?
Do I have that right?
>>1431301
They are literally using a normie approval metric to decide which guy is better.
>implying normies have any kind of discerning taste.
>>1431234
what did he mean by this?
>>1431301
lel
its a fucking wwe.com article
>fucking roman sucks! Get him off my TV now!
>viewers still drops
KEK