>mfw the "new era of WWE" is just the era of Reigns.

>>1255552
But he's still champ you fucking dingus.

Also, this "new era" crap is total bullshit. A new era isn't just when Vince says so, it's a total change of attitude, booking style, or the way the product is presented to us.

Having said that, there hasn't been a real era change since PG. It's the same nonsensical booking and storylines it has always been

>>1255833
I thought the same thing but think about when Vince announced the Ruthless Aggression era and that was sorta a thing. Plus none of these new era storylines are going to elevate until SS.

>>1255833
Post 2010 we have a lot more indie guys, guys from Japan, etc. There's definitely a change. The weekly show wrestling quality has never been this good as a result maybe matched by Ruthless Aggression/Smackdown Six era Smackdown

Does anyone else feel that there is potential for another boom period but know it won't happen cause Vince hates money not made his retarded way?

>>1255833
I don't think Vince gives a shit about anything else except that Roman must remain champion in this "era"

The era of stealing talent from other promotions

>>1256935
>offering better pay/exposure is stealing
Stay mad japcuck