Was it worse than Lesnar vs Goldberg?

No, and to say otherwise is being ridiculous.

No. It takes alot for a match to be as bad as that one. Could you imagine if stone cold wasnt there to wake the crowd back up?

>>1175619
I kinda enjoyed it until it ended way too soon.
If it got, like, Shane vs Taker's time, and got exponentially more vicious after its actual end-point, it would've been based. And what we did see would've served as an apt intro for the more destructive match-portion.

"No"

Not even close. It was one sided and short but still entertaining. Lesnar vs Goldberg was two guys who weren't interested and were afraid of getting hurt before they left. Their performances were genuinely shameful.

>>1175619
it was based
brock took him to suplex city, dean couldnt win in his own type of match. Brock looking strong, deanetty still in his spot. Gave him a nice match to look back at least.