Hybrids

>>2464544
Organisms that are able to reproduce is the classic definition.

>>2464544
The next step humanity needs to make towards genetically engineered catgirls is in interspecies cloning. If you had a willing human egg donor, the cloned kitten would have human mitochondrial DNA. Theoretically, you don't even have to implant the egg in a human either.
https://academic.oup.com/biolreprod/article-lookup/doi/10.1095/biolreprod67.2.637

Here's some chick that tried it with a dog:
https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?redirect=mobi&nocache=0.9772542924745581&depth=1&hl=de&ie=UTF8&nv=1&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=http://www.heute.at/oesterreich/oberoesterreich/story/Frau-lie--sich-Zelle-von-Hund-in-Eizelle-einsetzen-59767881&usg=ALkJrhh0Hy4Nxd2EqLruxNQC4URiPP-9FA

File: 1495357842746.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>2464556
Genetically engineered scorpiongirls > Genetically engineered catgirls

File: bYdJeqX.jpg (74KB, 452x603px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 452x603px

>>2464556
>>2464675
What about human girls?

>>2464556
Genetics don't work that way.

>>2464544
>Organisms that can produce fertile offspring?
no.
organisms that DO produce fertile offspring most of the time.

Many many species of animals CAN produce hybrids.

they just usually don't.

I want to know if humans & chimpanzees could create hybrids.

>>2464743
No. It's been tried. And probably many more times but they kept their mouth shut.

>>2464743
Probably would look terrifying.

>inb4 the most obvious jokes

>>2464544
>What would you define as a species? Organisms that can produce fertile offspring?
That is the classic definition, but it doesn't work with fossils/ any creature that breeds asexually (and there are more of them than you think).
So another method in that case is just by similarity.

>>2464678
Disgusting