dinosaurs and feathers

has there ever been a human wearing feathers that wasn't gay? Checkmate.

File: 960.jpg (69KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 960x540px

>>2438374
>has there ever been a human wearing feathers that wasn't gay?

Only one of them is gay.

File: IMG_6698.jpg (60KB, 317x295px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 317x295px

>>2438374
DIE!

File: get the cross.png (669KB, 450x1043px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 450x1043px

>>2438374

File: GodofDeath.png (1MB, 896x896px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 896x896px

>>2438367
I genuinely think the problem is because 90% of paleoartists are retarded fucking hipsters who like to make their dinosaurs "flooofy XDDD". And then they wonder why their's such an outcry of them emasculating once badass animals and their response is "omg you"re just anti science, get with the times". No, its because you're a fucking hack artist who is defanging dinosaurs to feed your own counterculture ego bullshit.

File: CmmV9j9WIAA3okO.jpg orig.jpg (341KB, 2048x1637px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 2048x1637px

>>2438667
Well, they probably see it as they can be either floofy and pretty like many birds, or bald and "ugly" like vultures.

>>2438671
hey, funnily enough, before opening that pic i thought it was some reconstruction of a feathered raptor

they really are alike huh

>>2438667
>once badass
if they had feathers and you don't think they're badass then they were never badass

File: Ugly nigga.jpg (5KB, 346x145px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 346x145px

>>2438713
That's not the point. Dinosaurs can be badass and have feathers like the tyrannosaur pic I posted up there. Most paleoartists do not graps this and depict dinosaurs like pic related

>>2438667
To be fair, real life doesn't conform to human standards of "cool". We shouldn't be basing the validity of paleoart on whether or not we think it's cool. That's not science. We should be basing it on the biology, the evidence, and our best guess based on the environment.

File: Hideous.png (306KB, 1600x834px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1600x834px

>>2438927
You're using the same retarded rhetoric that they are. "Omg if a dinosaur looks intimidating, that means its unscientific." We don't know what dinosaurs look like and theres a huge range of appearances that are still considered scientifically acceptable. People draw retarded shit like this and then get all defensive when people hate it. People don't hate it because they want your interpretation to be inaccurate, they hate because your interpretation is shit.

File: black-vulture-face.jpg (49KB, 600x508px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x508px

>>2438671
At least post an unattractive vulture

Honestly when I see a dinosaur with feathers it's really iffy for me. If it's a Tyrannosaur or a large theropod I won't like it at all but a dromaeosaur, I still don't necessarily like it but it's still better than an Allosaur. I think it's just that I've always seen dinosaurs as reptiles not birds and I think they look more natural without feathers.

File: Image00037.jpg (452KB, 1734x1228px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1734x1228px

>>2438927
>>2439304
Both of you have a point though. Humans have always used animals to represent their fears and emotions, and press their fears and emotions unto animals. You can draw a terrifying tiger just as easily as you can draw a cute one. If you make a bad drawing of a feathery dinosaur, then its a bad drawing of a feathery dinosaur.

File: andean-condor-bolivia-national-bird.jpg (131KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1024x768px

god I love condors

Jesus rode a trex

>>2438913
That one is plenty cool though.

>>2439542
Gobul is so cute