>exotic cat got raped by street cat
>exotic cat birth babies
>was expecting a few exotic cat
>all frikin street cats
why.jpeg
picrelated (one of her children)
>literally getting cucked by your pet
>>2379337
Wait until they're 8 weeks old, then strangle them individually and leave their bodies with your slut cat. That'll teach her to be a slut
>>2379337
that's because the 'exotic' breed cats tend to be exotic due to recessive genes. Long coats, specific colors and patterns, odd traits, usually all recessive
>>2379337
How do you know it was rape? It could've been rough consensual sex.
>it's another "i let my cat outside unsupervised and i don't like the consequences" episode
>>2379337
Post the mama's pic
>>2381396
Same reason there's a million pigeon breeds that all look distinct and unique but as soon as they're back in the wild they revert to typical blue bar coloring.
You can expect that to happen to all of our domestic species once we're gone.
>>2381403
the fuck is this
>>2381411
Jacobin pigeons. My pigeons zitter and this freaked me out at first until I learned that humans intentionally bred seizures into the animal. Why? For shits and giggles, I suppose.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a19wMjwDMek
>>2379337
same reason filthy mudbloods occur in people
>>2381403
It happens to pigs all the time.
this thread is poetic
>>2379337
OP you can be a scum bag and list them as half whatever cross on Craigslist for $600. Some dumbass will bite. See it all the time where I live. My favorite has to be regular tabbies sold as Bengals.
>>2381403
Theoretically though, wouldn't the f2 generation have a 1/4 chance of being fucked up like the P1 gen? Or are there multiple double recessive genes that cause that specific look in the birds in that image?
If it's just a few genes, two heterozygous birds will still have a (low) chance to create homozygous recessive birds
>>2379337
>letting your exotic cat outside
You're a fucking retard op and you deserve what happened
>>2381551
>If it's just a few genes, two heterozygous birds will still have a (low) chance to create homozygous recessive birds
True. There are problems with this in practice though.
>fancy traits tend to be very deleterious to reproductive fitness and survival ability.
>the animal expressing fancy traits will be borne into a society expressing wild-type traits and is liable to select its partner from wild-types as a natural response even if it does survive
>Fancy animals are rarely if ever released with a large enough founder population to sustain their fancy traits indefinitely.
>ypipo can't even protect their pets from "white genocide"
Eyyyyy gringo