daily reminder that animals can't love

File: 53157530b1f9706af63e9f0176775752405f80baad930a452837a5f3be6073bb_1.jpg (65KB, 387x379px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 387x379px

>>2244727

>>2244727
Explain people then
>inb4 robot sperg-out

Dogs can feel love and other human emotions

>>2244825
Im so butthurt that cats aren't capable of love. Would have been the perfect little pets

>>2244830
Felis are solitary predators so they are always sociopathic.

>>2244825
They feel only slavish obedience, because they're degenerate creatures bred to be slaves. No man-made thing can truly be said to feel love.

>>2244926
Says who

>>2244926
underage pls go

>>2244727
That's fine, love doesn't exist anyways. It's just instinct doing what it does.

File: souris11.png (21KB, 325x372px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 325x372px

redis sa

>>2244727
What is a dog but a machine for loving?
You introduce him to a human being,
giving him the mission to love
And however ugly, perverse, deformed or stupid
this human being might be
The dog loves him.

>>2244727
>love
Define this.

File: IMG_0279.jpg (43KB, 535x462px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 535x462px

>>2244727
Anyone who believes this is not only an edgelord, but is also wrong.
We have studies upon studies that at least dogs love us.
All you have is edgy facts that you learned from the totally reliable source of alienated youth.

WHAT IS LOVE

File: poochie.jpg (42KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 960x540px

>>2245049
love - /lʌv/
noun
The ability to pop a sick boner at the sight of a tasty bitch (n. a female dog)

>>2245054
baby don't hurt me

>>2244727
Well, dogs can produce the oxytocin hormone, which causes love. I don't remember well, but I think cats can too, but less.

>>2245061
radical bro

>>2244926
All humans are man-made.

>>2244926
reddit

no more

>>2244926
Man i wish i was 16 again :(

>>2244926
muslim detected, kys

>>2245152

What about the very first one?

File: 1476225786214.png (9KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 640x400px

>love

>>2245051
>We have studies upon studies that at least dogs love us.

no we don't.

emotions require subjectivity, subjectivity requires consciousness because if you aren't aware of your opinion you don't have one.

there are no viable methods to test consciousness in animals, so terms that require it can't be applied to them.

>>2246240
>there are no viable methods to test consciousness in animals
If that's true then why have you autismed all over this board for eons claiming animals aren't conscious?

>>2246241
it doesn't matter whether it's a 'no' or a 'maybe' in terms of whether they're conscious or not.

'emotion' wouldn't apply to them either way, neither would 'pain' or even basic terms like 'eating' or 'aggression' because they require intent.

if that intent or awareness hasn't been demonstrated, they don't apply.

File: 127814606985.jpg (24KB, 369x500px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 369x500px

>>2244727

360 degrees walk away

>>2245152
I mean I guess wherever you want to draw the evolutionary line would be made by our most recent ancestor.

>>2244727
Humans are animals. Trust me, we don't magically have a love organ every other animal doesn't have access to.

>>2246252
>implying humans can love

>>2246253
consciousness can't be tested properly so the only conscious being on earth is yourself for all you know.

>>2244727
Daily Reminder: Men can't even comprehend what love is.

>>2244727
Neither do humans then. "Love" is just a transient illusion to promote reproduction. You don't love anyone unless they provide some kind of benefit to your existence or direct relatives that share genetic code.

TL:DR; Humans are animals too and don't love either.

>>2246749
That's true, but they push onwards and love regardless, usually to their own detriment. Women only love money, objects, and fame. Sad!

Heres a fun question, when will plont finally realize his opinions dont shape the rest of our worlds?

Eat a fat dick plont