Rare Harry Potter Book Upsidedown

>>18577734

its worth nothing. why on earth would anyone pay more for a book with an upside down cover? these aren't coins or trading cards.

>>18577795
People do like to pay more for misprints

>>18577734
Google Search: misprint books

Literally the first result:
>Such errors are considered defects and will almost always have a negative impact on the book’s desirability. (Exceptions to this rule do exist but are few & far between.)
>Book printing and binding errors are fairly common.

http://www.emptymirrorbooks.com/collecting/misprinted-books.html

I can tell you that: Pretty much unless you've got a first edition copy. No. It's not worth jack shit. It's probably worth even LESS than a proper copy.

>>18577734
yeah check the edition, there's probably some fansite for that kind of shit. It may not necessarily say First edition or whatever on the inside page, probably just a string of numbers so you'll need to look into this.