Aiming low

>>18493159
Lower your standards, but don't stop going after attractive women too. Play the numbers, swing at every pitch and you might hit a fastball by accident.

>>18493171
>lower your standards

My standards ARE low, like 1/10 low.

>Play the numbers, swing at every pitch and you might hit a fastball by accident.

I think you might be misjudging the gap between me and the available girls. Like by a lot.


I'm just wondering that all the "homely" girls can't be in relationships can they?

>>18493189
They're not, you're just really that dumb

>>18493197
I feel like if I said something about redpills and sluts I might have got more than "just do it".

>>18493222
You're under the impression that every woman around who is ugly enough for you is already taken. That's dumb.

Keep looking for more butt-uglies. You'll definitely find some single ones.

File: 1499398725658.jpg (173KB, 908x1448px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 908x1448px

>>18493189
>ARE low
Online dating, stop whining and ask some girls on dates then.

You dont need to have common interests with the girl. At the start all you need is her to give you boner. The common interests and hobbies can be found later.

>>18493225
>You're under the impression that every woman around who is ugly enough for you is already taken. That's dumb.

Maybe women in their late 30s and 40s. I've ruffled through my yearbook, and every girl who wasn't a social butterfly is married/in a relationship.

>>18493256
You don't need to have common interests with the girl.

I'm sure I do, if I want a decent conversation.

>>18493256
stop posting that photo, cuck