How many hadrolags of kensiom does it take to trilestify a krutz-jakobson's

>>18488472
Only 3, 2 for each side

>>18488495
You're suggesting I use a sub-planar polygonal articulation defusing lens on the medial foramen?
I thought of that but I'm worried about cesium degradation (I can't trilestify in a vacuum in my home lab)

>>18488506
There is no cesium degredation if you're using a standard argon beam.

>>18488772
>What is sub-planar hygroscopic cesium degradation?
Do your homework kids

This is how I'm reading this thread:

>>18488472
>How many things of stuff does it take to whatever a someone-someone's diamond assuming it was cold water extracted? Using a standard noble gas beam btw

>>18488506
>You're suggesting I use a geometry articulation optics lens on the something something? I thought of that but I'm worried about radioactive decay shit (I can't whatever in a vacuum in my home lab)

Op here again I'm trying a ganzfield-klein superposition of my trilestis to carboxylate to kensiometric pressure.
If I titrate upwards I may discover how many hadrolags are necessary but I will also discover how hard of a metal diamond is

>>18489283
Wouldn't a google search be easier ?

>>18489294
>Implying Google search hasn't covered up the existence of polynominal kensiolation

>>18489298
Maybe you'll be better on /sci/. Don't you think Doug Dimmadome?

File: Doug Dimmadome.jpg (62KB, 720x544px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 720x544px

>>18489310

Hi, I'm Doug Dimmadome, owner of the Dimmsdale Dimmadome, and I dimmadon't believe OP's going to find the advice he's looking for here.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-05-22-20-56.png (537KB, 1920x1080px)

537KB, 1920x1080px

>>18489344
Dimma-drat!

>>18488472

15