Legal questions

>>18447282
Verbal agreement? Well I don't know if you have any chances of getting back that money legally, much less take the pet.

>>18447300
Verbal agreements/contracts are legally binding. I highly doubt you have any background or knowledge in the legal field.

>>18447300
Verbal agreements are legally binding. The only problem is with enforcing them because you have to prove it's existence. Which will be easy considering I have multiple messages referencing this "loan".

>>18447282
i feel an ex-girlfriend scenario coming on...

depends where you live, verbal contracts can be interpreted differently.

try the small claims court if your jurisdiction has them. you'll need to check out some proper legal forum too since there don't seem to be any legal eagles on here right now...

>>18447369
>i feel an ex-girlfriend scenario coming on...

No just a friend. I'm just a nice retard.

>>18447376
well your option is to lose the dough or lose a friend.

and we know what kind of value to place on friends like that.

time for a sit-down and a cup of tea...

ps: don't hand over the pooch til you've got the cash. refuse to do so, force his/her hand.

>>18447387
>well your option is to lose the dough or lose a friend.

Honestly I'd choose the dough any day. "Friends" are always just giving me more reasons not to trust them, and fueling my paranoia. I guess it wouldn't be paranoia though because it's not irrational anymore. I only have 1 friend that I've known for 10+ years.

>ps: don't hand over the pooch til you've got the cash. refuse to do so, force his/her hand.

I'm not the vet. I payed the bill because they couldn't pay it, they agreed to pay me back, and I'm a nice retard.

>>18447282

Joke's on you. With the $3,500 he saved by not paying you for his busted-up dog, he can get like 7 good new dogs.

OP can always dox him/her on here and see if we can rustle up a posse.
>inb4 NPA

PS: 3rd person plurals are ghey as fucking fuck.

>>18447421
>get like 7 good new dogs.

You forgot to factor in emotional attachment to this specific dog. It would destroy him/her if I took the dog.

>>18447455
>summoning an army of the dead.

I think I'll pass on that for now.

>>18447468
Why the him/her androgynous horseshit? You fucking faggot? If I was your mate, I'd fuck you over too for having such a blatant disregard for the English language. Consider it your first lesson in grammar.

PS: If the dog's still at the vets, then he'll be able to get it back since he has the license and the bill's been paid. You just have a worthless receipt. (Unless your contact details are on the docket and you can reclaim the mutt before cunt does.)

Also, what's wrong with holding the fleabag hostage til cunt coughs up? For nigh on 4K, that's what I'd do, and I'm an all-round nice motherfucker.

File: 1484432909829.gif (2MB, 400x319px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x319px

lawfag here (california)

short answer: no

long answer: dogs are considered property, like a car. and you can't take someone elses property to satisfy their debt to you. you can take them to small claims court and try to get a judgement against them for the vet bill (you will need to prove this was intended to be a loan, not a gift)