Should one base their dating life on what one can offer you, or passion and attraction?
Passion, attraction and what you can offer go hand-in-hand in romance. Your passion is what you can offer, that is your attraction(hopefully).
>>18303795
Who said you have to choose one or the other? I mean I'd say passion is necessary but not sufficient for a relationship. Find someone you're passionate about who also has their life together.
Everyone's really a superficial heartless bastard, including us, never think anything else.
>>18303795
passion. because romance is fleeting and what people can offer you can be pulled right out from under you in an instant.
build your own security and you can actually enjoy who you date.
Steer has far away from money, status, and security as possible.
Hard I know, but constructing relationships on that always end in disaster.
>>18303795
What one can offer. Attraction and passion are volatile. Most relationships end because the people only had attraction and passion. You're trying to build a life with someone. It's better to find someone who can bring something to the table.
>>18303851
>What one can offer. Attraction and passion are volatile. Most relationships end because the people only had attraction and passion. You're trying to build a life with someone. It's better to find someone who can bring something to the table.
Why would you want to build a life with someone you're not passionate about though? Passion is important, you need more than just passion but without it you've got nothing.
>>18303861
because passion fades, even the most romantic of couples can admit this. i still side with you for the most part. why do you need to build a life with someone? why is it so important that you have some future with a person, evenif you don't care for them that much?
why not just build a life by your self and just enjoy passion as it comes and goes?