There's nothing wrong with meat curtains

>>18295438
Aint nobody want dat stank ass pussy, senpai

a vagina is a vagina.

I don't understand why people get all pissy bout this shit. It's not like you're looking at it while gettin busy. Even if you're going down you can't even see it.

>>18295457
You can feel it tho
Feel all the nooks and crannies and weird textures

>>18295466
So. You're gay if it bothers you

>>18295466
...

yeah, like a vagina.

>>18295438
Ain't nobody wants to lick that shit.

>>18295477
Too much vagina

>>18295529
But it's normal. Lots of girls naturally have it. Dont judge a girl if that happens to her during puberty

File: there-amp-039-s-two-types-of-girls-apparently-one-can-amp-039-t-make-a-sandwich-right_o_4782083.jpg (69KB, 782x934px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 782x934px

>>18295438
I am average boy so i cant get too picky about girls.

But i like girls which actually enjoys sex and demand it.

Too bad that having flappy vagina doesnt have anything common with healthy view on sexuality and good libido.

>>18295544
Yeah its irrelevant. Her being tight is the only thing you should judge

File: 1481494354219.gif (1MB, 280x210px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 280x210px

>>18295438
There's nothing wrong with people having preferences, you are fucking retarded.

>>18295658
No duh but when you turn them down for it it's retarded

>>18295438

>What's wrong with you guys

This place is populated by kids and "adults" who never stopped being kids; particularly kids who still have not yet rectified the things they see in porn and the way life actually is.

They have much to learn.

>>18295658

I think this is the best meme. You get to be as retarded, judgmental, punitive or insulting as you want and all you have to do to make it all good is call it a "preference".

>>18295667
>>18295667
it really isnt

people need to stop being offended all the time

i broke up with my last girlfriend of 3 years because she wanted things to start getting sexual
you have to learn to drop people from your life

>>18295673
Why is it so evil to have preferences in your partner?
Like what the fuck
if you want to be so retarded as to not acknowledge your mental list of things you enjoy physically on a significant other then this is pointless

Why do people get so sensitive over the outie/innie vagina bullshit? a preference is a preference, i'd break up with a partner for having an outie belly button because that shits gross

>>18295543
I know it's normal
Doesn't change the fact that it's nasty

>>18295673
>It's okay for me to be retarded, judgmental, punitive, and insulting just as long as I have ~~objective facts~~ on my side

Worst type of pseud on 4chan

File: stoplikingwhatidontlike.jpg (241KB, 572x300px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 572x300px

>>18295673
Whatever you say hitler.

>>18295681
Human pair bonding is supposed to be about more than just physical characteristics
Because if you're just going based on that then don't even bother sticking with one person because everyone's looks will start to fade eventually and there will always be hot 25 year olds everywhere for you to chase
So people who like to chase should refrain from giving their opinions on monogamy since they just don't get it

>>18295707
>Human pair bonding

stopped reading there, quit regurgitating pop evolutionary psych on 4chan.

>>18295711
Continue reading
I didn't say anything about "love hormones" or whatever it is that is usually said when people use that phrase here
Although I've been away for a while maybe they're using it for something else these days

>>18295670
Than what are you doing here?
>ad hominem
You started first.

>>18295673
You cant go shaming people for having different opinions. And seriously, if guy will drop you because your pussy looks bad to him, he wouldnt be good boyfriend anyway.

Also you can try make a girl about obese girls being fat shamed and rejected by guys because they weight double the average boyfriend.

File: 1465866141490.jpg (82KB, 500x378px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 500x378px

>>18295707
>Human pair bonding is supposed to be about more than just physical characteristics

It's really just about breeding.

>blablabla looks fade
Yea, but outie vaginas and bellybuttons don't. They stay like that forever.

>So people who like to chase should refrain from giving their opinions on monogamy since they just don't get it

Lmao. Always count on the angry teen to retroactively proclaim everyone else wrong.

File: YouVirgin.jpg (6KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 300x168px

>>18295466
Oh look, someone that's never touched a vagina is telling us about vaginas.

>>18295756
>>18295756

>women get angry
>resort to calling men virgins

like poetry

>>18295764
I'm a literal expert on female beauty.

You're retarded.

>>18295772

what credentials do you have, and why does this validate your image

>>18295764

Not a woman. You've still never touched a vagina.

>>18295784
>>18295784

I have touched a vagina, but I fail to understand why you insist on this statement. Don't you think your argument would be stronger if it was valid and independent of criteria that varies from anon to anon

File: Jace Wallace16-666x1024.jpg (153KB, 666x1024px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 666x1024px

>>18295776
I'm a fashion designer, illustrator, concept and pinup-artist.

Pic-Related is my wooorrrrkkkkk

>>18295514
I do.

>>18295796
Your retarded description of how a vagina feels is a pretty good indicator you haven't.

>>18295674
Wat.

>>18295808
>>18295808

This is a nice image, anon. It looks like you have a lot of skill. But I fail to understand your image earlier still. I have no distaste to vaginal shape, by the way.

>>18295816

I have never described how a vagina feels once in this thread, my first post was >>18295764. I'm just tired of this enthymeme

>>18295819
Apologies. Then I will take your word that you have touched a vagina.

It doesn't change the fact the post I was originally responding to wasn't a great indicator of that anon's lack of experience.

File: 1491594782237.jpg (62KB, 640x576px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 640x576px

>>18295724

Listen, everyone has preferences, yes, but calling an ignorant or shallow opinion a "preference" doesn't absolve you of responsibility. What you fail to understand is that this isn't just about a vagina, this is about relationships.

In an actual adult relationship, you will see the most disgusting side of your partner. You will hear her fart and burp and smell her shit when you go into the bathroom. You'll see her with pimples and blemishes and god forbid you get a woman pregnant you'll have to hold her sweaty, pale hand while she bleeds and bloats and pushes out your child. When she gets older her skin will sag and her tits will go and she'll get wrinkles and her feet will harden and her hair will thin and eventually you'll be with an old woman. Accepting the imperfections of your partner is just as important, if not more important than cherishing her perfections.

There is a giant difference between having a "preference" and being so immature and punitive that you're not able or willing to see the positive characteristics of someone beneath their minuscule imperfections. Its okay not to love her vagina lips. Its okay not to be attracted to it, but to completely cut off a perfectly decent and otherwise compatible and not give her a chance because of a little bit of extra skin on her vagina really illustrates your immaturity.

Lets also not forget that you sir, are not perfect. Any girl who decides to get in a relationship with you will also have to accept the gross, shitty parts of you inside and out so if you fail to give a woman the security of knowing her boyfriend will still love and support her even though she isn't 100% physically perfect you'll your life alone.

Its okay to have a list of preferences but don't be a cunt about it. There is a line between having realistic preferences and being a shallow sack of shit and pretending like there isn't one is disingenuous.

All opinions are not created equal so lets not play this game.

>>18295831

Yes, I suppose so. I also want to retract my wording of "women get angry", I realize that's too powerful of a generalization. I guess I feel that using virginity as a way to invalidate arguments harms discourse, I often see a lot of convos derailed this way, and it makes things smoother. Just wanted in to pop in to mention that, unless there's some rebuttal I haven't heard...?

>>18295756
I actually own one
Touch it daily when showering and stuff

>>18295884
>showering and stuff

stuff??

>>18295808
(Do you have a blog that I can follow? I'm an artist too!)

>>18295899
Her name is in the filename of the image

girl drops a guy for having a small dick
>you go girl, girl power, yasss queen slay
guy drops a girl for having long inner lips
>that is not cool, she can't help it, what is wrong with you its normal

>>18295987

I've literally never heard this.

>>18295944
Thanks

>>18295991
Nah I somewhat agree with >>18295987
"Size matters" gets said a whole lot more than "tightness matters" - and aren't they basically the same thing? The former is somehow more socially acceptable to say than the latter.

>>18295817
>>18295674
>sheldon cooper itt

>>18295438
I have heard girls talking about not liking circumcised/uncircumcised guys
we talk about this here
(I keep my opinion to myself btw) but why are people triggered by this topic?

>>18295474
I wouldn't fuck an disgusting asshole, doesn't mean I'm straight

>>18296001
Neither are socially acceptable. Last time I checked, we kind of treat size queens like giant fucking whores.

>>18295438
My girlfriend is an innie, I wish her lips were bigger because I fucking love the texture of 'em, it feels so good to lick them.

>>18295884
You should go into greater detail about this. Just to confirm you're being honest.

>>18295849
I havent expected so much wisdom in thread like this about vaginas. You are right. I am still shallow person with huge room to improve.

Thanks?

Why are girls allowed to complain about uncircumcised penises, but anytime a guy complains about roast beef pussy he takes heat for it?

>>18297783
Well at the end of the day, really it's women who care the most about looks, as evidenced by the way they cake their faces in shit to compete with each other for attention.

For further evidence, compare how often you see a guy with a less attractive chick than how often you see a chick with a less attractive guy.

Furthermore, observe how many women openly say on dating sites "I want a tall dark guy", whereas guys don't tend to do the same, e.g. "I'm looking for a short busty girl".

But calling double standards out is a female preserve, so don't expect femanons to own this.