9/10 sex with a 6.8/10 gf or 4/10 sex with a 9/10 gf? Assume

>>18280714
Are you kidding me? The uglier one and 9/10 sex. No fucking question! (I expect 9/10 means 90% of my kinks fulfilled)

>>18280714
10/10 sex with 9/10 wife.

9/10 gf with 4/10 sex, but I'm abnormally shallow

>>18280725
9/10 would mean that or any other aesthetic preferences. What if we raise the 4/10 sex to 5/10 sex or 6/10 sex?

no sex

ever

>>18280750
No. 9/10 is near perfect sex. You under estimate my priorities Obi wan!!

>>18280755
Interesting. Ok, then how about 7/10 gf and 7/10 sex vs 9/10 gf and 4.5/10 sex.

9/10 sex obviously. But I currently have 10/10 with my 8/10 gf so I'm good

>>18280769
Im not going below 7 sex ;) I appreciate the questions though

>>18280714
>4/10 sex with a 9/10 gf
Obviously. Sex doesn't take that long too make it a priority and it's always easier to up your game than changing your looks.

>>18280769
4.5/10 sex still easy wins.

>>18281012
Sex skills are not just training though. Just as sprinting is not just training too. I am putting forward both at their top game possible.

>>18281055
>Just as sprinting is not just training too.
But it is, unless we talk about Olympic level of performance where genetics limit you.

>>18281142
Genetics limit you way before that. Everyone can get to a decent level, but how bad the diminishing returns are and the natural limit are genetic mostly.

Also the numbers I presented would represent either how good they are, their potential and/or how good are they willing to get performance and aesthetic wise.

>>18280714
10/10 sex with my 10/10 bf is good.