Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: DrugTesting101.jpg (263KB, 3840x2400px) Image search:
[Google]
263KB, 3840x2400px
So I took a drug test on Friday that I had to do for a job. As of today, the status is still pending, so I'm pretty worried I failed it, specifically for weed.
I used to smoke weed pretty regularly, but this past year I have really cut down a lot, and recently the past two months, I've barely smoked at all, and I know I was clean for about a month leading up to last week. Last weekend though I got really drunk and though I don't remember smoking, since a lot of my friends are weed smokers, I'm afraid I took a puff or two and don't remember.
Thing is, there's also a chance the reason its taking so long is that I tested positive for adderall, which would actually be a good thing since I have a prescription for it. I took 40 mg of XR adderall I believe either 2 or 3 days before the drug test. Would it have still been in my system then? And anyone have any similar experiences?
>>
Weed test has telltale signs to pick up on, for how much and how recently. I'm good and fucked because I'm into edibles which go straight into your body tissues and stay there.
>there's also a chance the reason its taking so long is that I tested positive for adderall
Who fucking tests for this, the Ministry of Truth? Not doubting your story, just a bit bothered.
The only drug test which actually matters is the gut hunch of a manager who is actually worth their salt - just my opinion. Real leadership is like the loch ness monster these days, so no wonder companies are going bankrupt on lab tests for every damn thing except product quality and customer satisfaction.
>>
>>18258154
Well they test for amphetamines, which is found in adderall.
IMO, I think drug tests for stuff like amphetamines makes sense. But testing for weed, and having such a low threshold for weed I think is ridiculous. Like I could potentially not get a job for taking 1 puff on one of my last weekends in college and a week before a drug test (assuming I did take a puff which I'm still not sure hah).
>>
>>18258176
Maybe you should've thought about that before becoming a junkie. Answer this, would you personally hire someone who destroys their brain cells on weekends?
>>
>>18258176
>But testing for weed, and having such a low threshold for weed I think is ridiculous.
It is ridiculous. There are lots of places that don't test or don't care. Consider getting a job at one of those places.
>>
>>18258211
you mean, like alcohol?
>>
>>18258211
I would if they had more brain cells than the other candidates. And since when does smoking weed occasionally in college make me a junkie?
>>18258253
Easier said than done hahah. This company is really well respected though, figured I'd base my job decisions more off that than who drug tests or who doesn't.
>>
>>18258142
Weed is illegal. As a employer I would not hire someone that has no issue with breaking federal law as well as one that shows poor judgement and decision making skills by smoking weed in the first place.
Get fucked stoner scum.
>>
>>18258333
Glad youre not my employer then...
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1