Online dating

>>18253158
Compliment her appearance. Her smile, her eyes, or her hair. If she responds positively (not just "Thanks" or "Thank you") then you are attractive to her and should proceed instinctively. If she doesn't, then literally look for another woman because there are 3 billion on this planet.

>>18253183
Isn't that the most generic opener there is? There's probably dozens of guys hitting on her in the same way.

>>18253203
>Isn't that the most generic opener there is?
Perhaps but if you message around ten women a day, the efficiency matters. You will get responses and you will get dates if you put in the numbers.

Besides, you are overestimating the intelligence of the people messaging her. Sure they get lots of messages a day, but they are usually basic one word lines like "Hey" or are overly sexual. By not being disgusting and complimenting a non-erogenous feature they will actually give you a look.

>>18253219
>Perhaps but if you message around ten women a day, the efficiency matters. You will get responses and you will get dates if you put in the numbers.
I understand this but the number of matches is pretty low in my area. When you narrow it to attractive chicks it's even lower. And attractive chicks over 30 who declare interest on guys who are 24, even lower. Hell, some 26 year olds have their desired age as 26+. And now okcupid implemented a system where you can only see people looking for your age in your matches (however I found a way around it, change my age, search, save the names, change age back, go directly to the profiles). It still sucks tho.

It doesn't fucking matter. Just contact her. If she likes you, you'll end up on a date or more. At 32 she's less likely to play stupid games or be swayed by superficial things.

>>18253233
>however I found a way around it, change my age, search, save the names, change age back, go directly to the profiles
wow you sound like a creep