Masturbating to porn that isn't of your sexual orientation

File: checked.jpg (11KB, 430x320px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 430x320px

>>18239878
Congrats, you are a closet homosexual now. Tell us when you coming out is about to happen, okay?

With love,
Dad

>>18239878
i've jacked off to every legal kind of porn by now and i'm still straight, its just porn its like watching a chick flick with a girl and secretly liking it

>>18239900
>>18239900
I'm open to the possibility but I've thought long and hard about it and there's just no way I could honestly pursue another girl romantically

>>18239900
>>18239878

still C L O S E T E D

admit it OP, you like dick

>>18239878

every one of my boyfriends felt this way before they started dating me. i had actually thought the same thing.

you cant imagine it because for years it was hammered into your head that you like girls. truts me once you get past the initial fear, its easy.

i look forward to dating you.

File: Don D. Raper 3.jpg (15KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 413x395px

>>18239951
>no way I could honestly pursue another girl romantically
Now you know the struggle men have. We, too, just want to fuck 'em because they're too much of a hassle. Thank you for understanding. I love you.

>>18239878

I'm sort of like OP.

But the thing is, I can imagine being romantic with a guy. Just not the guys posted on /hm/.

wtf?

>>18239878
Well that's one way to slowly come out of the closet.

>I'm gay but i'm not, get it?

No I actually don't you fucking faggot.

>>18239971
>>18239971
I've toyed with the possibility but I'm certain I couldn't bring myself to passionately look into another girl's face and put my mouth on hers while sober

>>18240003
Ever heard of Taboo fuckface, ever been ashamed after you came gtfo

>>18239951
>>18240005

My gf is the same, but we did have threesomes and she got hooked. If you're so into it, why not try OP? You don't have to pursue relationships with girls just for the experience, and society is MUCH more forgiving to girls who experiment with girls. Tbh I might be biased, but female bissexuality and experimentation seems to be an incredibly common trend nowadays

>>18239878
>literally internalised the patriarchy
You're a living meme. Go date girls, you'll just get used to the idea with time

File: I'm dying here.jpg (450KB, 1000x900px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 1000x900px

>>18240021
Am I the only one who gets genuinely disgusted of the easy bisexuality of women? Ugh, it's so unattractive it's beyond measure.

Do they think so highly of their gender? Do they want to come off as cool and hip? Are they so disgusted of men that their own impregnable sexuality seems appealing?
Please enlighten me.

File: 1486738995189.jpg (25KB, 270x320px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 270x320px

>>18240034
Maybe they just think girls are hot? Why are you looking for a more complicated reason?

>>18240034
You're not the only one obviously. But I'd say women are naturally more inclined to bissexuality than men. They are naturally much more touchy and emotionally open with each other, and modern society (as in, from the 70's on maybe), the female sexuality exploration has been very encouraged.

Personally, I find it hot AF, so I do all I can to encourage it lol

porn addiction, be thankful you didn't go for scat or cp or whatever
you might have to quit all sexual activity for a while

>>18240042
Because it isn't as simple as that. Behind every emotion and action is a complex rationale, you cannot deny that. What we feel attracted to has been contributed by interwoven inner and environmental factors.

>>18240047
C-can't comprehend. What do you find attractive about it. Elaborate. I'm all ears. For example, I cannot stand "lesbian" porn at all, and neither threesomes with excessive girl on girl action.

Eh, women are weird. Just look at the okcupid stats on attractiveness ratings by sex. Always blows my fucking mind when I think about it.

>>18240061
What if I told you that everyone's naturally wired to want to fuck everything that moves and there is just less social factors that repress women experimenting with homosexuality? I mean, it really isn't rocket science.

>C-can't comprehend
Noone can understand a fetish they don't have. It's just that this one is common, so you're kinda fucked in the sense that you'll have to live with it being thrown in your face

>>18240061
>C-can't comprehend. What do you find attractive about it. Elaborate. I'm all ears. For example, I cannot stand "lesbian" porn at all, and neither threesomes with excessive girl on girl action.

Well, women have an inate potential to orgasm multiple times in short periods of time, while we guys don't. Their bodies are so full of erotic zones that it's nearly impossible to stimulate all of them alone, and I don't like guys at all to have an extra male hand helping me. That and the only thing that I can think to be better than a woman, is more than one.

There is constant female moaning, constant female orgasming, and that is hot as fuck. When they cum they don't make a mess that needs a cleanup, unless there's a squirter involved, and even then it's mostly water. One of the threesomes I had, I actively avoided cumming just so I didn't need to leave or force one of them to cleanup.

Idk it just feels natural to me as a man to have the impulse to fuck more than one women, I guess instinctively I'd like to impregnate both of them, and why not have the beautiful view of two women making out and constantly moaning and cumming while I'm at it?

>>18240011
I have. I fapped to unstimulated torture once, and I felt awful afterward. I tried watching gay porn recently (for science), and before I'd scrolled through the first page of results I was bored and no longer horny and wandered off to do something else. It's not at all the same. And yeah, I fap to shemales from time to time. I'm not afraid of dicks.

>>18240076
You're a square, Jesus. Take classes in psychology 101, maybe the human mind would have more depth than "just 'cause" to you then.

>>18240086
Regarding stimulating every possible erogenous zone: Don't you think you put the woman on a high pedestal there? Your tongue, hands and penis are more than enough tools to cover. I differ here; I don't want to spoil her with adding another person who pleases her. Your not-cumming-because-they-don't-have-to-cleam-up reason is worrying - you want to enjoy sex too, don't ya? The climax is also important, and a mess is to expect when fucking.

And regarding their consecutive orgasms and moaning: I associate a submissive image with it, where the woman does nothing but just kneel or lie there and gets pounded, which is okay to a certain extent, as long as she provides some action too.

Guess I'm a complete 180 of your fetishes. Thanks for sharing, it was informative.

>>18240011
Taboo works for incest for example.

Sexual orientation is a whole other thing you fucking retard.

>Faggot trying to turn being gay into a taboo.

You're gay, end of story, don't try to twist it.

>>18240034
Women have a much more fluid sexuality than men. They adapt to what's around, which is why it's a thing for women to go into (womens') prisons straight and come out (no pun intended) lesbian. Meanwhile, men imprint on a certain demographic in early puberty, and rarely if ever change. Apparently this has something to with hormonal balance as it's apparently common for transexuals to change in the range and fluidity of sexual attraction as they undergo HRT.

>>18240146
Interesting points. I read that male food-chain of alphas, betas and omegas needs to be preserved in a male society, and this is why homosexuality is usually out of question there, since it would literally fuck with the primal order and would be a sign of massive submissiveness and inability of finding a female mate to procreate. This is supposedly the reason why prison rape is a thing, to keep the omegas at their utmost so alphas demonstrate their "assertiveness" and have their group of fearsome betas.

Or something. This post is a mess - I'm sleepy.

>>18240132
>Regarding stimulating every possible erogenous zone: Don't you think you put the woman on a high pedestal there? Your tongue, hands and penis are more than enough tools to cover.

No I don't think so. I mean, I can think of at least both nipples, G-spot, clitoris and ass, that sums five. Plus other secondary zones like buttocks, mouth and so on. You can't, for instance, fuck her and get her clit sucked simultaneously alone. Mind that I'm not saying that it's impossible to please a women and make her cum buckets alone. But having help makes it heaps more fun and easy to get them way over stimulated.

>Your not-cumming-because-they-don't-have-to-cleam-up reason is worrying - you want to enjoy sex too, don't ya? The climax is also important, and a mess is to expect when fucking.

This only happened the first time, where we made out in my office and I didn't have a condom at hand. The following times I did cum, obviously. It was just to ilustrate how "cleaner" women are in this regard.

>And regarding their consecutive orgasms and moaning: I associate a submissive image with it, where the woman does nothing but just kneel or lie there and gets pounded, which is okay to a certain extent, as long as she provides some action too.

I don't think it has to be submissive, quite the contrary. I've helped when both humped each other for instance, which imo would make me the submissive part.

>Guess I'm a complete 180 of your fetishes. Thanks for sharing, it was informative.

Np, it's... refreshing to discuss this with someone who disagrees but keeps an open mind. Believe me, even I don't know where I got this fetish from, I haven't watched porn about it frequently for years now...

>>18240138
Projecting much? Don't shame me cause you wanna fuck your Dad lil boi. Anything with stigma attached to it can be considered taboo, you're wrong and you're ignorant

>>18240167
Well, no, not really. Homosexuality is common in nature, both between peers and in pederastic adult/adolescent pairings. I'm no expert in the matter, but I'm wary of any explanation that paints homosexuality as unnatural, as there's mountains of data that says otherwise.

>>18240523
With "common" you pretend like homosexuality is usual among animanls, which is not, it is a rare exception. The same with humans.

And where did I state that it is unnatural, you illiterate fuckwit? I stated a thesis I heard of why men aren't as sexually flexible as women.
I think homosexuality has always a cause, but not everything going on in our brains isn't unnatural.

My porn addiction kept escalating through hardcore, incest, rape fantasies, shemale, but never guy to guy gay porn, never interested me. But still, my mind was getting more and more fucked up over time.

This is why I stopped watching porn, nothing was working anymore for me, and real sex was dull and boring to me.

I took it one step further and do nofap.

So far I don't regret it, I feel so much better now. You'll know you're a porn addict if you feel this itch now and then to watch porn, that shit isn't normal, if you want to get better you have to stop watching it all together.

>>18239900
double dubs with 9 and 0
This is getting philosophical.

>>18240059
pretty much this

OP you might be hypersexualized and of course, you are getting confused

try to stop looking at porn, use your mind when you REALLY really want to masturbate.

Porn is a slippery slope

also, what this guy said:

>>18241379

It's the opposite for me, I can see myself in a intimate relationship with several cute twinks (last instance I fantasized about was this blonde guy from 13 Reasons Why) but I can't jerk off to actual gay porn or the thought of gay sex.