Bing porn

>>18185960
If you have to undergo a series of special procedures to acquire porn, then you should assume that someone will think you violated the law.

Stay away from CP. It is not legal. It is not safe. If you have to make a thread on 4chan, you do not know enough and should use that as precedent to stay away.

>>18186053
That is what i was thinking to begin with, but still using bing and simply searching jailbait webcam and coming up with possible cp as your first results seems like a bit much doesnt it? Or do you think those pictures are all honeypots?

>>18186057
You should assume that you are breaking the law, if only in the eyes of someone who can ruin your life.

>>18186084
I know...i already do and refrain from downloading them. I just wanted to see if someone else came across the same thing and what they did. The only thing that keeps me thinking its ok is the disclaimers, could they put a fake one? I mean does the fbi really make honeypots that are this easy to find, isnt that entrapment? Maybe it is covered as just nudity?

>>18185960
What a search engine turns up and whats legal are two separate things. Google cannot host any illegal content. But they can certainly store links to it. Its the same reason why torrent sites are so hard to take down. The torrent link isnt illegal to have. If the torrent sites weren't retarded and trying to make money from it kickass would still be up.
Anyways Im not actually sure looking at CP on the internet is illegal. I think you need to possess it. But that can also be in the form of cache stuff in your browser.

>>18186212
My thoughts exactly. I guess im just asking if the videos that come up are legal? Would they fall under the definition of harmless nudity or is the fbi setting those links up? It really would be unfair if they were honeypots and i just got entrapped.

>>18186107
The disclaimer might not be valid in your jurisdiction, and you do not sound like a guy who knows how to represent himself on appeal in court.

>>18186245
I guess, i feel like im fighting a losing battle with this. But at the same time i cant help but think, could this really be a honeypot? Maybe it does count as innocent nudity as long as there is no sex?

>>18186321
The legislature can mess with you and you can deal with a mean judge, at the same damn time.

Individual people can lobby the government to do those things to you, specifically. Those specific individuals can even cause you injurious harm in the course of persecuting you.

>>18186370
It just seems weird because its not like im typing "child porn" and looking for it directly, so how could those sites really all be honeypots if theyre everywhere that couldnt be legal could it?