Just curious, what do you all think: Is being fit but tiny and

>>18167272
It's always better to be bigger in the evolutionary view, but you gotta rock with what life gave ya. I'm tiny but im thankfully blessed down where it matters. Make bitches scream and cream, but i do gotta work harder to attract them. Win some lose some.

If anyone wants to know some context as to why I'm asking: I used to be a bit husky, but got really skinny in college. I've started lifting (been 6-7 months) but putting on weight is tough now, and smoking cigs doesn't help.

I just want to know if I should be happy enough being pretty strong and lean, in case I never do gain much more muscle. I enjoy the exercise, so there is that, but I want some of the visual aesthetic too.

>>18167286
That's true, you can't change yourself, only make improvements.

Inb4 I meant tiny as skinnyfit, not short :p

This guy is not featherweight bro. He's middle weight, that means he weights 84kg in the weighting day, and is pushing somewhere between 95 and 100kg in this pic

What is best is probably determined by your baseline. If you're of the mediterranean stock like me (75%), your genetics are oriented towards leanness. Nords have an easier time putting on solid mass. And if you stick to the women of your race, they will be more attracted to it because they have evolutionarily selected for it or have been forced to because it was the phenotype of ideal mates.

>>18167302
I see where you are getting at, but personally I believe it's better to divide things into meso/iso/exomorphs

>>18167294
Ohhhh. Well in that case, just build a bit more muscles in the arms and shoulder than the guy in the op. Legs optionally. Moderation is best between skinny/crazy muscular. Its aesthetically attractive and being stronger is always valid. Definitely go for the best your body can offer without sacrificing flexibility

>>18167272
That's Chris Weidman, probably walks around at 200.

>>18167346
Nahhh, he is 185 or so. That was a bad example for featherweight haha

>>18167346
Also, probably should've put a picture of mcgregor up, as I'm trying to hit 150-155

>>18167272
Neither is better. What's better is whatever you prefer, unless you're planning on going out into the woods to fend for yourself and live like an animal. Find a goal and work towards achieving it, no one is going to be able to answer this question for you.